User talk:Ouatssss--23

Welcome!
Hello, Ouatssss--23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chinese New Year did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Drmies, Hi, thanks for letting me know the deletion of context. I've added back a few paragraphs that have direct book references or antiques to prove the information. I'll search for more reliable sources for the leftover deleted edits. The history of Chinese New Year is long since China's history is long, and throughout history of its development new customs were added and old customs were discarded. I wish the wiki page can show people how Chinese New Year evolved by ancient Chinese people's own originality. I'll keep on adding details of its development. Thank you again.Ouatssss--23 (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Content, not context. And I reverted you again, for a number of reasons--one is simply the grammatical English errors. Another is, still, that this additional information lacks proper secondary sourcing. Now, you are a new editor, and perhaps you are not so familiar with what we do, but it's important that you learn that we do not include every bit of possible information, and that content should be based on reliable, independent, secondary sourcing. In other words, an editor's opinion on what is important and what isn't should be determined by secondary sources. Finally, please see WP:NPOV, which disallows edit summaries like this one. Drmies (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Drmies, I've added back the deleted content with secondary sourcing. And as for this one, it involves politic topics for sure. However, Hong Kong Macau Mainland China Taiwan are all regions of China. The first three regions are administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, a fact respected by international society and acknowledge by wikipedia. As for Taiwan, its official name is Republic of China, and countries all over the world honor the One China policy. Even recently, U.S. State Department says U.S. "one-China" policy has not changed. The country has not been unified yet, but neither has Taiwan administrations declared independent. So it's improper to only write "countries" in that sentence.

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rice cake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tangyuan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * DPL bot Link fixed~ Ouatssss--23 (talk) 06:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to India ink, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   Firestar464 (talk) 02:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . The India ink clearly stated that the ink was invented in China, however mistakenly given the name india ink by English people in 16th century. Would that be sufficient? Best regards. Ouatssss--23 (talk) 03:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ Firestar464 (talk) 03:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you!~ Ouatssss--23 (talk) 03:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The WP:COMMONNAME in English is "India ink" - that is what matters, whether or not you think the name a "mistake". Johnbod (talk) 03:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That sux. I guess this ain't the place to WP:RGW. Firestar464 (talk) 03:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ... Okay then... Hate when things invented by China are called under another country's name. Ouatssss--23 (talk) 04:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hanfu. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spudlace (talk) 04:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Can you please see through my edit? I was copy editing the redundant wording. Best regard. Ouatssss--23 (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Chinese painting
Ok, better get on with that, or I will revert the lot. All that stuff about pigments belongs much lower down the page, if anywhere. Johnbod (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The section is about the explaining the alternate name danqing of Chinese paintng, not about pigments, which from my point of view is important enough to be put at front. And I will copy edit the section as quickly as i can.Ouatssss--23 (talk) 03:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Why was I pinged? Firestar464 (talk) 04:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, made a mistake. Ouatssss--23 (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)