User talk:Oumaimasslimi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asaf Vidal Vanunu (June 3)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Asaf_Vidal_Vanunu Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: None of the sources are reliable and/or independent so does not suggest the subject can meet notability and would need be completely rewritten to meet encyclopedic standards.

S0091 (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * how i can creat an article without rejected and what the reson for rejected my article Oumaimasslimi (talk) 12:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Draft:Asaf Vidal Vanunu, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Do not remove AfC declines or comments. Doing so is considered disruptive.'' S0091 (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * i have all information for my page Oumaimasslimi (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Oumaimasslimi. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Asaf Vidal Vanunu, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Oumaimasslimi. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)


 * why u deleted my page Oumaimasslimi (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)