User talk:Our Day Will Come

I've blocked you indefinitely as your contributions are clearly those of an established user working under another name, which violates our policy on multiple accounts (especially as you used this account to vote in an AfD). | Mr. Darcy talk 19:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Getting unblocked
This seems like the block could be a little harsh, remember "dont bite the newbies! especially without any proof. Can someone please tell him what he needs to do it he wants to appeal and get unblocked. regards--Vintagekits 00:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiccol
I suspect that Wikiccol may also be the work of this person- user account created in the last few days and immediately attack me in the manner as this person. Astrotrain 09:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Why dont you request a user check?--Vintagekits 09:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes please request a user check before going around making accusations Wikiccol 10:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * To be honest I don't have the time or patience to be chasing vandals and the like. Astrotrain 10:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm on it. I'll get to the bottom of this! Logoistic 19:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like we'll never know, as apparantly it's an entirely unique IP (see here). Logoistic 18:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case the account should be unblocked.--Vintagekits 22:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No, it shouldn't. User is clearly not new and his primary purpose was to give Astrotrain a hard time. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Its purpose was to impersonate as a sock of Vintage, surely. Logoistic 23:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Was it?--Vintagekits 23:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Look at its history of edits, or let me do it for you and look at one of the checkuser cases I put in, e.g. see here. Wouldn't you agree? Logoistic 23:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The IP check showed up that it is no other user!--Vintagekits 23:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I know, but that just means they could be using a seperate network (e.g. using their computer at work for the sock, and their home computer for the puppetmaster account). Logoistic 23:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well that is an assumption but doesnt prove much.--Vintagekits 23:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The contributions make it completely obvious that this is an established user. Why do you have such a strong interest in this case, when the user him/herself hasn't even weighed in? | Mr. Darcy talk 02:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Because I don't like illegitimate socks! Logoistic 12:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)