User talk:Outlander07/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Outlander07/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Outlander07/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Outlander07/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Outlander07/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Outlander07/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Outlander07/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Outlander07/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Outlander07/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thamarakudy


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thamarakudy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thanks, EditQwerty (talk) 12:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Don't throw the word "vandal" around so loosely
Go read WP:NOTVAND.

You and {{u|Othayoth_shankaran]] need to discuss your disagreements instead of calling each other vandals. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Apology for what happened from my part. I will try to discuss disagreements soon. Outlander07 (talk) 07:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Ronaldo Shani
Hi there, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the db-nocontext tag from the page Ronaldo Shani that you placed there, because there is enough context in the article to understand who it is about. WP:A1 explains when to use this speedy deletion rationale: articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." It applies only to very short articles. Note that context is different from content, treated in A3. This excludes coherent Non-English material, and poorly translated material. If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate. Don't tag under this criterion in the first few minutes after a new article is created. The fact that it is a very short article isn't, as far as I'm aware, reason enough to delete it. There may be other reasons to delete the article, but I just wanted to point out why I removed the tag you added. Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  15:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Updated with AndhraPradesh Capital details
Bro,

I am not sure where are you from. But I just want to update you that Hyderbad is not AP capital any more. Now Amaravati is capital of Andhra Pradhesh. I see that you reverted my comments and Kept Hyderbad as capital of AP.

Still keeping Hyderbad as capital to AP do not make sense. but yes it is history. we can write it in other contents.

Think once personally.

as part of asserts sharing, your brother got existing house. and your family advisors asked to stay there not more than 10 years. That does not means you have to stay forever. you have to move out of that house as soon as your house is ready. you have to show your identity.

Ap Capital is Amaravati only. I am not sure who miss guided you on Ap Capital.

if Government has different plans, let us see when they come into force. till that time Amaravati is capital of Captial of AP.

Hope we donot need to change Captial info in wiki in every 5 years :-)

Good Bless AP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manforap (talk • contribs) 19:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Check User talk:XxPixel WarriorxX. Already informed User:XxPixel WarriorxX to check for what the source says. I know the source says Amaravathi as capital, but need reliable source to substantiate the claim. Might need admin intervention on this. Try to provide reliable cites for disputed edits.Outlander07 19:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Missing link in signature
Hi ,

please make sure that your signature contains a link to your user talk page (Signatures).

Thanks and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I would like to add to 's comment. Not only do you need to fix you signature so that it links to your user talk page, but dark blue text on dark grey background is quite illegible. Seeing it in your report at WP:AIV today is really frustrating. I was tempted simply to ignore it. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

, . I apologies it was a mistake. As you said I changed my signature as the previous one was illegible. Thank you Outlander 07@talk 06:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and no worries ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hi outlander,

3 Capital plan is not yet approved by both houses in AP yet. that is just proposal only til lit become law. for now Amaravati is only capital for AP from govt sources of AP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manforap (talk • contribs) 09:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Include reference for your claim, that's what I told you to do. Outlander 07@talk 09:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 17:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

RedWarn - Quick Survey
Hello Outlander07! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.

To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey

Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767  talk!  22:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.

Changes to kshtriya
Andhakar, and vrishni vansh belongs to yadava dynasty इतिहास विश्लेषण (talk) 06:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Need reliable sources, see WP:SOURCES WP:V.Make sure to provide proper sources while affixing this comment into the main article. Outlander 07@talk 07:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Shobana Wikipedia profile
Hello User,

I have done the new modification as per the proper consent from the concerned people. We have noticed multiple times that someone keeps on modifying a particular content since 2018. We do not want some irrelevant information to appear on the page and thus requesting you to please do the needful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratz wiki (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, can't find anything that you said on the article talk page. Never remove contents and references without talk & proper edit summary. Start a discussion on the article talk page for user consensus. Outlander 07@talk 16:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Shobana Wikipedia profile
Can you please check the talk section of Shobana and let us know if any other information is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratz wiki (talk • contribs) 16:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Shobana Wikipedia profile
Hi,

We would like to remove the below content from the Wikipedia profile of Shobana which the artist's close circle do not want to put in public. Would be really helpful if someone could help us to remove this. Please treat this as a genuine request and do the needful.

"She has an adopted daughter Ananthanarayani.[15][16]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratz wiki (talk • contribs) 17:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

You can post the same on the article talk page.If there any disagreement discuss for consensus. Outlander 07@talk 19:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

OK got your point. Outlander 07@talk 19:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello Outlander07,

We do not want this to be discussed on a public forum and thereby getting unnecessary attention from a lot of people. This is something that is strictly personal for the artist. If the concerned artist do not want to put some information pertaining her in public, then why do we go after a public opinion. This seems to be really disrespectful. We feel this is something that needs to be taken care of with the help of cyber police. We shall take it up in that way if nothing can be done to rectify this from our side. Also, we do not have much expertise in Wiki editing and all..... We wish to do the same correction again on page. If it's again getting rolled back, then will see for further options stated above. Thanks for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratz wiki (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 16:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Note for deleting
My changes about the CPIM split wasnt unconstructive, I removed the roumours without citation and in the place I've put the facts. I want the text back. I have citations necessary for it.How to put it back

Provide a reliable source than adding facts. Articles relies on written sources other than POV pushes and original researches. Use article talk page for your concern rather than removing contents blatantly. You can discuss the same on the article talk page. See WP:OR WP:NPOV. Outlander 07@talk 16:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Even the current positions of split cuz of indo-china ware is a baseless POV without any citation. The unclassified documents of CIA say that the happening of indo-china war is a mere co-incidence.

Thats what i told you to use article talk page. Outlander 07@talk 07:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear Outlander07,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Regarding HK page
Hi Outlander07, I corrected the percentages because while I was reading the citations provided with them, I realised that the percentages were misinterpreted the other way round ie the percentages for 'Yes' were shown under the 'No' column, so I corrected it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardaat Singh Baath (talk • contribs) 15:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the mistake and Thank you for notifying me. Now I can't restore your edits.You can do the same again. Outlander 07@talk 18:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Snippet views
Hi, in this series of edits, you added sources using Google Books snippet views. You should not do that because we do not have the context for the statements made. If you cannot see at least a few pages either side of the source (and preferably the entire thing), it is usually best to say nothing. I can see more than snippet view but it still is not enough to verify with certainty what you said, eg: I can see three full pages that mention Moopils but none of them in sufficient context to be certain there are not significant qualifying statements made by Kurup. Nor can I be sure which page you were referencing because you did not provide a page number. - Sitush (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Swaminarayan Sampraday
Hello, I found your talk page and wanted to see if you had time to check out this article Swaminarayan Sampraday under the Gunatit Samaj section.

I want to propose the following edit:


 * The Change (Update Section):
 * The Yogi Divine Society was established in 1966, by Dadubhai Patel and his brother, Babubhai after they were excommunicated from BAPS by Yogiji Maharaj. The brothers were expelled after it was discovered that Dadubhai illicitly collected and misappropriated funds and, falsely claiming that he was acting on the organization’s behalf, led a number of young women to renounce their families and join his ashram under his leadership. Dadubhai believed Pramukh Swami, was against him and persuaded the BAPS trustees to remove him. After Dadubhai’s death in 1986, an ascetic named Hariprasad Swami became the leader of the Yogi Divine Society. The Yogi Divine Society became known as the Gunatit Samaj and consists of several wings: namely, Yogi Divine Society, The Anoopam Mission, and The Gunatit Jyot.Yogiji Maharaj's images and prior gurus are displayed at all Gunatit Samaj temples.

I don't understand why the response to the allegation cannot be included. The main source being used is page 66 of this book https://www.google.com/books/edition/An_Introduction_to_Swaminarayan_Hinduism/tPkexi2EhAIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=dadubhai&pg=PA66&printsec=frontcover.

Additional sources:

Swaminarayan Prakash. June 1966. Mumbai (Dadar): Akshar Bhavan. https://www.google.com/books/edition/An_Introduction_to_Swaminarayan_Hinduism/tPkexi2EhAIC?gbpv=1&bsq=dadubhai https://www.google.com/books/edition/Acts_of_Faith/Sgs9BAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22dadubhai+patel%22&pg=PT170&printsec=frontcover https://books.google.com/books?id=B105DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1241&lpg=PA1241&dq=Encyclopedia+of+Global+Religion+%22dadubhai%22&source=bl&ots=hghnOQA7w3&sig=ACfU3U07yz4vj7-S4DetzURrHYcHtCxvJg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDgfi2v_bqAhXPQc0KHcnGCvgQ6AEwAXoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=dadubhai%22&f=false https://www.google.com/books/edition/Dharma_and_Development/SorXAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=dadubhai https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304302683_'Networked'_Religion_in_Network_Society_Case_of_Swaminarayan_sect

Applebutter221 (talk) 00:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Coz you are a sock Outlander 07@talk 16:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Allegedly copying text from page "Aksai Chin" into another undisclosed page
Hi,

You recently reverted my edits on the page Aksai Chin and explained on my talk page how it "appears that [I] have copied or moved text from Aksai Chin to another page". I would like to argue that this is an invalid claim as I had at no point copied information from that page and moved it to another as my subsequent edits had absolutely nothing to do with the region of Aksai Chin. I have so far only worked on one other page after my work on Aksai Chin and no information was moved. The only thing I had changed about Aksai Chin as a page was cleaning up the first two sections of information and adding a minor detail about the 1963 Sino-Pakistani Agreement. Aside from this, I had added an area value (which had been lacking before this due to lack of references) which I cited with a reference I found myself. If I am overlooking something, please let me know.

Xeed.rice (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

You can't use wikipedia content itself as a source. Read WP:MIRROR. Also, note that Wikipedia is not a reliable source as per WP:NOTSOURCE. Apart from this you are welcome to make edits. Outlander 07@talk 12:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi , you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page. Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly! María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC) If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

You may benefit from using RedWarn
Hello, Outlander07! I'm Ed6767, a developer for RedWarn. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to try RedWarn, a new modern and user friendly tool specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over two hundred other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on RedWarn's talk page at WT:RW. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed  talk!  16:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Re: Steve Scully article
Thanks for restoring the accuracy of this article to show that Mr. Scully was an intern for Sen. Joe Biden. Hopefully your level of authority will stip this back and forth nonsense. C. Allmon (not registered) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.77.146.250 (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello this is Serv181920
Hi Outlander07 Thank you for writing to me on my talk page. I am new to wikipedia, hope to learn something from you. Today I made 2 changes on the page of Religion in India and I noticed that you reverted those changes saying that there was no "accurate edit summary". There was edit summary except for a minor edit. I removed this part "and Bahá'í Faith in the world,[3]" because it was poorly sourced and added a sentence regarding the number of Baha'is in India from "https://censusindia.gov.in" which is the official website of the "Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India". Hope my edits were inline with wiki rules. Before I undo your "reversion", i would appreciate to hear a word from you. Thank you. Serv181920 (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hi, I have removed content from Ernakulam page. Because Tamil is not the official language of Ernakulam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saravana123456 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Make sure to provide a proper edit summary after making changes. Outlander 07@talk 06:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Outlander07. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AOutlander07 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 04:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.