User talk:Outso

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear Outso: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community Portal
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How to edit a page
 * How to revert to a previous version of a page
 * Tutorial
 * Copyrights
 * Shortcuts

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~&#126;). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

About Outso
I've moved your page about yourself Outso to your userpage User:Outso. Please see WP:Autobiography and WP:USERPAGE for details. Happy editing! Inner Earth 15:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Outso:
Your recent edit to Outso (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism or link spam to the page. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Outso
A tag has been placed on Outso, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Inner Earth 12:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

re Au Chi Ho
If you're yanking my chain Ima be hella annoyed sport. I'm busy. Please read WP:BIO and get back to me if you have a genuine beef. Herostratus 03:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, it's an encyclopedia, not a yearbook. We have people like Einstein and Beethoven and Sun Yat-Sen and so forth. Not students. You may take your case to deletion review at WP:DRV, although if you do the only affect will be to further annoy your fellow Wikipedians. Why not use some of your excess energy and intelligence toward improving the Wikipedia? It's fun. Herostratus 03:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ar. Don't argue with my deaf ears then. My hands are tied by policy. Take it to WP:DRV. After you've read WP:BIO... Herostratus 04:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Go to WP:DRV for a deletion review. This will provide you and the Wikipedia community a full chance to review my actions and restore the article if I am judged to have acted wrongly or if it would enhance the mission of the encyclopedia to restore the article. If the community believes that scholars engaged in research would be aided by the existence of the article, it may be restored. Herostratus 13:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)