User talk:OverLordGoldDragon

Talk:Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus#Proof_of_the_theorem
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus. Please review this discussion before re-adding the content. Thanks. -- samtar whisper 16:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Fundamental theorem of calculus, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- samtar whisper 16:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Please sign your posts
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. -- samtar whisper 19:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Edit war at Fundamental theorem of calculus
Your recent editing history at Fundamental theorem of calculus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. D.Lazard (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You're now at three reverts. Please stop re-adding the content and discuss further. Thank you -- samtar talk or stalk 19:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)