User talk:OverlordQ/Archive 2

WNBA edits
I added a reference, though. I don't vandalize pages.

98.215.89.130 (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yahoo Answers is not a reputable source. Q  T C 00:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

OverlordQBot seems to have stopped
It seems to have stopped resetting the sandboxes a couple of days ago... Ashanda (talk) 04:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, still some strange edge cases that dont pop up too often. Q  T C 12:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Excellent! Glad to see your bot's back chugging away. Cheers! Ashanda (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Inquiry on Programming Bots
Hello. I'd like to inquire on how to program a bot to assist in World War Wikipedia (also known as the War on Vandalism). Please leave me a comment on my Talk Page about how I can begin this project. Tigerclaw81 (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Photo
Hi there, I was wondering if you know the policy of taking photo of a box of a product. May we use it on Wikipeida? --Senorelroboto (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm probably not the best to ask about there, only thing I can suggest right now is reading image policy, I'll see if I can't find somebody to refer ya to. Q  T C 23:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Laetitia Casta
Looks like you've added Casta's article to your watchlist as a result of my recent requests for semi-protection. Thanks for your assistance. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 00:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

RfBAG
I asked a couple questions at your RfBAG. Dragons flight (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Not ignoring 'em, just busy with finals, I'll try to get to them today. Q  T C 08:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

A modification of interiot's wannabe Kate tool...
Hello, Privatemusings directed me your way after a few beers last night - I am looking for a tool which would modify part of this one   -I was keen to find a tool which lists my mainspace edits by article - bit like the section on this but listing all articles and ranking by number of edits rather than just the top 15. Is it easy/difficult etc.? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd have to take a look at it. Q  T C 22:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. No hurry, its been on my mind for a few months and I haven't a clue who to approach as Interiot retired. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Update
Hey, had any progress? If you really don't have the time or the inclination, it's no big deal as there are other people I can ask. If you are interested or have begun doing so, then great and I really appreciate it. I was just checking in.... Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it. I'll ask someone else. No big deal. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Redfarmer (talk) 21:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well the user obviously doesn't agree with you about the genre thing and you've both reverted three times. I'd say that's a healthy edit war. Redfarmer (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * He doesn't seem to agree with consensus either, or what anybody else thinks Q  T C 22:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've left a message on his talk page instructing him to engage in discussion before any further reverts and have reverted to the last good version before he edited. Any further edits on his part will be in violation of WP:3RR. Hope that helps your situation. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 22:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank ya kindly, thanks for the warning as well. Definition of 'Simple and Obvious' vandalism tends to get a little broad sometime. Q  T C 22:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Found poetry
Just an observation...found poetry sometimes will get test/joke edits/vandalism, and I'm thinking, the more people who have this article on their watchlist, the better. It seems a bit abadoned. Can you add to your watchlist? --Justpassin (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

ACC
Sure is. :) Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk)  19:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: Your message
Yes it is, I've requested to get the rights. Please leave a note if there is anything else! Best regards, -- 'Kanonkas' :  Talk 18:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

George Carlin
Yip, it's true. His soul is going up on the roof and not coming down. We weren't to know any better; it took a while for someone to get a source in there, but I guess that's why the policy exists :) ~ Ameliorate U T @ 05:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Everyone knows George Carlin's soul is going to a garage in Buffalo. Duh.

Toilet Man
No thanks on the offer to test my editing. I rather just get my 15 minutes of fame and play pranks until I get banned. It's more fun that way. The point of Wikipedia may mean different things to different people. We will agree to disagree on the interpretation of the concept of anyone being able to edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.45.213 (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

OK delete my message. That's cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.45.213 (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

You seem to be naive to the point I am trying to make. This isn't a policy issue. I am not trying to say that joking isn't vandalism or that vandalism should be left up. I am trying to change the obnoxious attitude people like you have towards harmless joking. Get a sense of humor. If you see a prank image of a toilet on a random page, go ahead and remove it, ban the user, whatever. But at least appreciate the joke in it and stop taking yourself so seriously. Just smile, delete, and move on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.45.213 (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not harmless. That's why it's called vandalism. Q  T C 17:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Stop being self-righteous. Just because Wikipedia defines something a certain way doesn't make it true. I don't accept force-fed bullshit. A prank toilet image is harmless. It gets removed in minutes. It gets a quick laugh and then everything returns to normal. Get over yourself dude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.45.213 (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

OverlordQ: By the way... thanks for stepping in re the above user. I know I tend to be too lenient at times (and fail to respect WP:DENY)... it's a result of my optimism towards the reformation of vandals. Didn't seem to work in this case though. Gail (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I probably fed the troll a bit more then I should have, you made your points well, but he just wanted to be a nuisance. Q  T C 19:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Prince William
Hiya.. there's a bit of a brouhaha over at Talk: Prince William; your input has been requested. Prince of Canadat 13:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Coal Miners Black Lung Disease
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Q T C 00:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh - easy enough to overlook. And I see you added your own speedy template. Not often someone puts a speedy tag on their own work! As to the disease, diud you know that Pneumoultrasilicovolcanoconiosis can be sung to the tune of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious? Grutness...wha?  01:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Bots/Requests for approval/Milk's Favorite Bot 2
Yes, I meant to write "talk pages with no corresponding article" not "orphaned pages." Sorry for the confusion, « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  18:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:UserStatus
As you use this template I would just like to tell you that its default page is now (for example) User:Addshore/Status but it would be your subpage. This is due to the fact that the status bots have been shutdown and new means of updating your status take you to this subpage. I will not check back here for replays. If you would like to comment about this or want to ask a question please do so on my talk page.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 06:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome friend!
Hi, and welcome to the Arkansas WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to Arkansas on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here is a few suggestions.
 * You can check out topics on the main page.
 * You can add WikiProject Arkansas to talk pages of Arkansas-related articles, and assess them as well.
 * Check out the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page. -- Chet B. Long Talk / ARK 05:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for your kind words. It has been a long time since I have had people laugh at something I've invested huge amounts of my time in. If you ever need anything please let me know. --mboverload @ 08:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I swear mediawiki needs smiley support. Q  T C 08:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Brad Cottam
I'm reverting edits clearly added by the person mentioned in the content he's adding. He's adding info saying "He backed up this guy in high school" even though the player is unknown and not notable. That's vandalism in my book.► Chris Nelson Holla! 03:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Content disputes are not valid exceptions to the 3RR rules. Q  T C 22:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not a content dispute, it's vandalism. Sorry, but I'm not going to let that stand because of 3RR, and you shouldn't either.► Chris Nelson Holla! 23:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

We used huggle at the same time
Could you please remove my warning, as we used huggle at the same time.

Thanks, TheSuave (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Just for future reference you can remove it yourself using the "Undo recent actions" menu. . Oh I see. Nevermind lol. Q  T C 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Lol. I usually get the editor who gave me the accidental warning to take it off my page. Looks better in the edit history :).

TheSuave (talk) 23:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I thought you meant for me to remove the warning you left, and I was thinking wtf is he talking about. Q  T C 23:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Huh? I'm starting to think wtf are you talking about? :p TheSuave (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Richard Hawes image
I noticed that Image:Richard Hawes.jpg is up for deletion, apparently for some kind of weird wiki-bug. I still have the image on one of my machines; will it help if I just re-upload it? Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 15:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have re-uploaded the file. Please let me know if additional action is required. Thanks. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 12:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

a note
Wasn't yelling at you, you couldn't have known about the OTRS and other issues, and I missed the link you provided. Anyway, no harm no foul, cheers. &rArr;  SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  21:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

CSD I2
Hi, for images that are related to 14635, you can just tag those as CSD I2 using db-i2. Thanks.  howcheng  {chat} 21:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arkanasas newsletter, updated for August
-- Chet B. Long Talk / ARK 04:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

uploaded images
hi OverlordQ, i have uploaded some test images to test the output from the wikitext 2 odf- writer im accually working on. i pledge to delete them if they aren't needed anymore.

if i awoken your interest, please see our website: http://code.pediapress.com/wiki/wiki.

greetings Rfbb (talk) 10:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pinksowhatcover.jpg
This image seems to have a valid fair use claim, including mentioning the copyright owner so I was wondering, why did you tag it as having no info on its copyright status? James086 Talk &#124; Email 11:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Non-free images need a copyright tag, source information, and use rationales. All it has in a fair use rationale. Q  T C 13:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok then. I added a copyright tag and changed the deletion reason to no-source. I'll see if the uploader can provide a link but judging by her talk page it seems unlikely. James086 Talk &#124;  Email 14:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

uploaded images

 * Images listed for deletion
 * An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rfbb1000x100.png, Image:Rfbb500x100.png, Image:Rfbb200x100.png, Image:Rfbb100x100.png, :Image:Rfbb100x10.png, Image:Rfbb50x10.png, Image:Rfbb20x10.png, Image:Rfbb10x100.png, Image:Rfbb10x50.png, Image:Rfbb10x20.png, Image:Rfbb10x10.png, :Image:Rfbb10x1.png, Image:Rfbb5x1.png, Image:Rfbb2x1.png, Image:Rfbb1x10.png, Image:Rfbb1x5.png, Image:Rfbb1x2.png, Image:Rfbb1x1.png, have been listed :at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its :entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Q T C 02:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi OverlordQ, we moved our test enviroment to a private wiki setup. so the images are not needed anymore. sorry for the discomfort.

thanks, Rfbb (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Barrese Uploaded Image

Q, I also replied to you on my user page--don't know which you prefer. What needs to be changed on/added to the photo on the  Sasha Barrese photo? C. Kilpatrick (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Fractal images
Can they be automatically be transfered to the commons, or does it have to be done manually? --Simpsons contributor (talk) 01:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and moved 'em for ya. Just waiting on an admin to go over them and delete the ENWP copies. Q  T C 01:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Image
My first disclaimer is that I am a novice and not well schooled with Wikipedia policy. Thus I recently inadvertently uploaded two copies of the same image using different names. I did not understand that the first upload which was to replace a previous image that was a non-standard logo actually worked. I uploaded the image again thinking I needed to use a different name. You have corrected my mistake and I hope I understand better the reason. Eagle (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD
I've nominated Obama Republican and McCain Democrat for deletion. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RAC.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:RAC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Needforspeedporsche911gt3.jpg
Hi! Thanks for telling me about the image I uploaded. I am not sure about how to upload an image correctly. I merely wished to upload an image of a screenshot of the upcoming game Need for Speed Undercover. WIth the free-use rationate guideline... I feel I put something that made somewhat sense. However, it clearly needs work. Do you think you could help me? Kenavt (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Recent Changes Bot
Hi ,

I was told by FunPika that you have a recent changes bot (A pretty good one from what ive seen), I was wondering if I might be able to obtain a copy for my wiki. Cheers Prom3th3an (talk) 10:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Front Page.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Front Page.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

protection of "Tax haven"
I note your talk page starts thus:


 * Welcome to OverlordQ's talk page on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit

Why is it that Tax Haven is protected? Paul Beardsell (talk) 11:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I dont know, I didn't protect it. A good place to start would be the protection log.  Q  T C 13:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Talk page
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 02:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Dunno who's # that was, but I already sent of an email to oversight for the halibut just in case. Q  T C 02:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lady GaGa-Poker Face.ogg)
Thanks for uploading File:Lady GaGa-Poker Face.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

You have pants
;] &mdash;harej // change the rules 20:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank Cat
  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Thanks for finding the fix for the PHP wikibot classes =]  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 20:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

RE: ACC Confirmation
Yes it was me that applied for access to the ACC Tool. -- Frehley Space Ace 05:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

ACC Appeal
Hey, I was recently turned down when I applied to help at the account creation process. I completely appreciate the decision, but I appealed as I wanted to put my reasoning etc across, and explain why I wanted to take part. I have recieved no reply, and I'm sorry to bug you like this, I'm sure it is just oversight or something. Thanks for taking the time to consider my application, Macromonkey (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Roughly 80% of your edits are from February (the majority Twinkle edits), while yes your account has contribs from last November we like to see that people are active in the project so that we can be sure you know the policies involved, in addition to the fact that private user information can be seen, we err on the side of caution. Q  T C 02:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah ok, if you are referring to my email address, I will set up another to use for wikipedia. And yes, I have only recently become really involved recently, but thanks for the consideration. All the best, Macromonkey (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Watchmen
Maybe so, but I'd rather have a page history need correcting than an article with the vandalized title. As of right now, no one has gotten off their ass to fix the page.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  05:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * No, if people start to edit the Watchmen article, there is no way to merge the edit histories. So it's better to leave the redirect. That is why when you try to move the redirect back to not just copy the content.  Q  T C 05:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's the lesser of two evils in my opinion, especially given the response time of the admins right now.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  05:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not lesser, to comply with licensing issues the history must be preserved. Q  T C 05:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

ACC block - RE: 24280
Hi. I believe it was you who last night blocked me from ACC last night for request 24280. I came onto IRC today but it appears you have been inactive, but I've heard pretty all I need to hear from stwalkerster. I mistook that request as one from a blocked permanent IP address, instead of an anon-only static IP, and because it was permanently blocked, I assumed I should have dropped the request. It's clear that that was a misunderstanding on my part and it wasn't at all an intentional "omgz lets cause havoc on the tool". I was wondering if you'd be in any position to unblock my status on the tool, since judging by my past hundreds of account creations, there should be no issue. Also, can I ask why a message on my talk page wasn't enough? I feel it was inappropriate to block a long-term user of the tool for one mistake, which was not patently abusive in it's own right. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 16:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I know and I apologise, I was just wanting to make sure I didn't miss something obvious with the request. The reason you don't drop those requests is because AOL proxies send the XFF Header, unfortunately the toolserver does not have the same exemption as the rest of the WMF wikis so instead of seeing the real source address we see the proxy IP. So all of the AOL proxies will likely show up with a ungood block/edit history.  Q  T C 20:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Lesson learnt, no worries. This could have been explained without a block though, but it's all in the past. Cheers for the unblock and explanation. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 20:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

ANI
I have mentioned your handling of Aloemps here. You might want to add your $0.02. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 15:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Parappa664
Not a problem. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
cf38 talk  20:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * And again :) cf38  talk  20:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Nomination
 MBisanz would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact MBisanz to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Requests for adminship/OverlordQ . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Sorry!
Sorry for accidentally reverting your RFA transclusion, I didn't mean to. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

RfA
Just wanted to wish you the best of luck. :) <font face="Trebuchet MS">&mdash; <font color="#5A3696">neuro <font color="#5A3696">(talk) 19:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

<h2 style="display:none;">Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009 <div style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; border-bottom:1px solid #AAA; padding-bottom:2px; margin-bottom:10px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> Unsubscribe &middot; Single-page &middot; Full edition &raquo;  — 16 March 2009


 * News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
 * Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 23:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Thank you for your efforts to help clean up Wikipedia. As a suggestion, please don't use the db-talk template on non-Talk redirect pages. Instead, use db-redirnone. This ensures that the correct edit summary is generated when the page is actually deleted. Thanks again. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah, much apologies. Might bug the TWINKLE people to change it to csd-g8 instead of using db-talk. Q  T C 16:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Bureaucrat
I'm just wondering, when you were a bureaucrat, did you have the option to give yourself +sysop? GT5162 (我的对话页) 17:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes. Q  T C 17:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

re:Images
§hep Talk  07:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

RfA a success
A consensus has been reached by your peers that you should be an admin. I have made it so. Please review Administrators' reading list and keep up the great work. Sincerely, Kingturtle (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * How was your brief stint as a bureaucrat? :)  Majorly  talk  17:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Long enough I could get a screenshot for posterity sake. Oh well, maybe in another 5 years ;) Q  T C 17:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Put it this way, you've done far better than most RfB candidates have ever done. :D Acalamari 17:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the miscue, and thanks for being a good sport. Kingturtle (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations! -- Ged UK  18:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations! Use the tools well now you have the right ones. Camaron | Chris (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)




 * Congratulations! - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Congrats, Q. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Glass  Cobra  02:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your note. Yes, the userification will leave a lot of broken redirects.

I thought a robot cleaned up after this kind of broken redirects. Did I get that wrong?

If there is a robot, letting it take care of deleting the broken redirects works for me.

I got a kind of tunnel vision, and created some articles losing sight of whether they could survive an afd. Hence the userification. I will be userifying additional articles. I leave a list of the existing redirects on the article's talk pages. That will help recreate any of the useful redirections when the articles are expanded and moved back to article space.

Thanks for asking.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Trumpet repertoire
Thanks for the article. I had in parallel started a stub that grouped them by type: User:DavidRF/Sandbox. I could go either way. Are you familiar with the other repertoire articles? I had looked at flute repertory but I'm not sure if there is a standard. Thanks. DavidRF (talk) 04:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Santiago de los Treinta Caballeros
A page with the correct spelling exist Santiago de los Treinta Caballeros which is redirected to Santiago de los Caballeros This new page that I tag for deletion misspelled "Trienta". So there is no need for a new blank page, with the incorrect spelling.--Juliaaltagracia (talk) 05:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not a blank page, it redirects to Santiago de los Caballeros. One of the things redirects are used for is to help people get to the right page if they misspell something. Mispelling Treinta as Trienta is likely a common mispelling.  This way they'll still get to the same destination.  Q  T C 05:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I dont think you are right. This is not google or yahoo. It is not correct. How many misspelled pages are people going to create. It is not right, people who don´t know how to spell will think that it is also a variant of the word. I will not leave a page like this existing in Wikipedia. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There are redirects from misspelled words all over Wikipedia. It is actually one of the official reasons for redirecting a page (See WP:Redirect#What do we use redirects for?).  I think it's fine to keep it that way.  -- jhan  CRUSH  05:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * This way if somebody *does* misspell the word, they're sent to the right page instead of thinking "Oh hey, there's nothing here, I'll write something" and we end up with two pages about the same thing but one is spelled wrong. As jhanCRUSH pointed out above, this is one of the things they're meant to be used for.  Q  T C 05:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I really can´t believe my eyes. the page is not necessary. It was created today. Nobody will really look for the name of Santiago de los Treinta Caballeros. I´m from the Dominican Republic, people just say Santiago or Santiago de los Caballeros. Sorry I don´t agree and don´t think it is right to encourage misspelled words. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 05:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't see how pointing them to the correct place when the do misspell something is encouraging misspelled words. I see it more as helping people know what the correct spelling/names are. While people local to the article may pronounce/say it a certain way, Wikipedia is not targeted to a specific area and we must try to make it accessible to a wide range of people as possible.  Q  T C 05:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Your note
Yes, I did, and for the reasons I stated in the request. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Cámboya
Please see my new message in the discussion page of Cámboya. Thanks. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 01:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)