User talk:Ovlem

Welcome!
Thanks.Ovlem (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Canterbury Tail  talk  19:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Canterbury Tail   talk  11:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Ovlem for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Canterbury Tail  talk  11:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Obviously I can't edit the page to defend myself at the moment, but I shall state here that these accusations are false and are quite bemusing. I'd suggest you do a checkuser as soon as possible so this can be closed asap without wasting too many peoples time.Ovlem (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Canterbury Tail  talk  15:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

You were reverting to vandalism! Look at what you are doing in future!Ovlem (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. --Jza84 | Talk  12:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not interested in playing cat and mouse frankly. Sockpupptry aside (which is crystal clear without the need for checkuser), you're edits are not conductive to the good of the project, and if I see a repeat of edit warring, I'll block on site. Talk first, achieve consensus, then edit, simple as that. --Jza84 |  Talk 19:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I am not a sock! Just because some other guy who edited Irish stuff had socks accounts doesn't mean I am one of them!Ovlem (talk) 19:15, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Bad luck for you eh. I wonder where you were between 19:30 and 20:00?? Seriously, Wikipedia is not a battleground. Tempt fate with other admins by all means, but on my watch I expect you to behave and stop using multiple accounts. If you can't bare the thought that other people disagree with you, and you have to pretend there's more than one of you to gain preferences, then this site is not for you. --Jza84 | Talk  19:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)