User talk:Ovmsharma

Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Help me!
A newly created page does not get listed upon search Please help me with...tips to bring up the page upon anyone searching with key words.

Ovmsharma (talk) 02:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Okay, step number one is to decide which page you want to keep. User:Ovmsharma/sandbox or User:Ovmsharma. I recommend that you keep the sandbox, since it is generally frowned upon, if not forbidden, to work up article content on your userpage. You can just blank the content of your userpage or replace the draft with a few words about yourself and your WP editing.


 * Step number two is to realize that these draft articles are not visible to search engines and will only become visible once they are accepted as articles.


 * Finally, the draft is currently unacceptable as an article. It fails in many ways to be suitable as a Wikipedia article: it does not provide references, much less in-line citations. The language is too laudatory for a neutral encyclopedia article. And, while it seems likely that we can establish notability for this artist, that still has to be demonstrated. For notability we need in-depth coverage in reliable, independent sources. You have offered two external links, which might perhaps be turned into references. I can't read them, so someone who can read them will have to make the notability assessment.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  04:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)