User talk:OwenX/Archive 1

Shorting/spreads
If you want to discuss edits, use my User Talk page. Don't go and trash my User page, and then mark it as a minor change!

Also, have the decency to sign your comments. OwenX 16:10, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Aloha, I just clicked and wrote. erase it when you are done. I usually do sign my stuff. I must have missed it. I was heading out to the beach and wanted to make an immediate reply. seemed minor to me. GT

User 207.127.143.101
Thue, you have blocked 207.127.143.101 last month for a day, but as you can see this had no effect, and he is back to his usual vandalism. I opened an RfC page for banning him; would you second my motion? OwenX 21:15, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Sure. But given the IP's behavior I think any admin already have the possiblity to just block the IP, without needing to create a RFC. I just blocked it for a week more; the only reason I didn't make it longer is the chance that somebody else gets the IP assigned in the future. If he comes back and vandalizes just a single time more I think blocking for a month would be in order, again just based on the blocking policy, without the need for a RFC.


 * You can use Administrator intervention against vandalism if you see a user/IP which should be blocked. Thue | talk 07:48, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hared
Actually, only in a colloquial sense has "chared" come to mean "fear" alone (see, for example, Exodus 18:19, where it clearly means "tremble"). The reason for the colloquial usage is obvious: Frequently, people often tremble out of fear or dread. In fact, the word is commonly used in the context of trembling out of fear. Nothing, including the sources you mentioned, contravenes translating as this word as "tremble." The article already mentions that Haredi means one who trembles out of fear. HKT talk 17:05, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Small problem with blocking...
... User:MinorEdit, one of our contributors, gets blocked if I block those IP addresses. - Ta bu shi da yu 23:41, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Merged pages can't be deleted
Hi, if content has been merged from a page it is not a candidate for speedy deletion, in fact it should not be deleted at all, for licensing and other reasons. Please just redirect to the page it has been merged to. See Merging and moving pages. Kappa 18:59, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Canadian beer, WP:WPB
Hi,

First -- strange, what are the odds of a Hebrew-speaking guy fooling around in Canadian beer articles? :) Anyway, just wanted to let you know about Wikiproject Beer, if you didn't already, which you might like to join. Also just to say hi, and thanks for making the improvements to a couple of articles that I saw (and probably some that I didn't). Please feel free to get in touch with me any time! --Daniel11 07:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

My bad
Yeah, I had that Chicago Mercantile Exchange article really screwed up. I was going to fix it, but I had to go do something before I got around to doing it. Thanks for fixing it! I also added some more detailed information. I'm amazed at how that exchange operates, and I felt that its page needed to be expanded upon a bit. Clinevol98 17:20, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

thx
Thanks for the user talk page cleanup - although I have to say, "Can I really edit this?" is remarkably tame vandalism! :-) FreplySpang (talk) 19:39, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm not complaining. It's just that I have another frustrated vandal emailing me "fuck you" messages several times a day, so the little message from Steven R. Smith was funny in comparison. Thanks for your work on reverting Steven R. Smith's more annoying efforts! FreplySpang (talk) 19:55, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * We seem to be tag-teaming G-Unot, too. (sigh) Cheers! FreplySpang (talk) 22:35, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup. I just added him to WP:AIV. Hope an admin does something... Owen&times; &#9742;  22:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * You should probably be leaving warnings on his talk page, then. It's not really fair to block someone without giving him a few chances to realize the error of his ways. FreplySpang (talk) 22:40, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Hm, you seem to have caught on to that. Jumping to test4 was a bit aggressive though. FreplySpang (talk) 22:41, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but after two of your warnings, and considering the nature of his edits, I felt it was justified. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for reverting the minor vandalism to my User page. I appreciate the help. If you need a little help with Japanese beers (I am NOT an expert, though), let me know. --Calton | Talk 01:10, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Jtkiefer T - 22:36, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Categories
Hi, -- Re categories; mostly I try to organize categories so that they have 150 or fewer articles in them. I don't mind if articles are in multiple categories, as long as they don't also appear in the parent category. Since "number theory" is potentially a huge category, I'd prefer to use it for articles that "don't fit anywhere else" or are "so important, they should be headliners". linas 00:01, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Ah, well, saw your reply. In that case, "hi!", welcome to the math pages. I invite you over to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Mathematics for general chatting about such topics. linas 00:20, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Hey OwenX
or should i say...MalcolmX. That post you just deleted about Anti-pope John VIII was the truth man, stop fucking with history (posted anonymously by User:62.252.192.9)

Speedy deletion tag
Hi there! Your speedy deletion tag on All about networking should probably have been a copyvio tag, so I changed it over. Being "non-encycloepdic" is not a speedy criterion (per WP:CSD), and should be taken to VFD, and being copyright violation has a separate process. Nice to know that someone's looking out for these kinds of articles though! -Splash 01:33, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
OwenX,

You don't understand. First off, there's no point in merging the article because it's COMPLETE DUPLICTE. The reason why we shouldn't merge because it has a bad title. There are many Tamil gods! This DOES meet criteria because it is vandalism by some anon. --Hottentot
 * That's rediculous. As if an admin is never going to check the page history before they delete it. --Hottentot

Get a Life
Dude, you really need to get a life. I feel bad for you if all you have is removing comments between family members on a free expression user page. I would ask if you had anything else better to do, but I think I know the answer. (posted anonymously by on 19:33, 1 September 2005

Wiki Nazi
OwenX, You are like a Wikipedia Nazi. You just won't let anybody have fun. Why not let Dkkicks see the edits and then change them himself? It's not like I'm dissing him or saying anything malicious...calm down. (posted anonymously by on 19:43, 1 September 2005

Carl Singebricks
That guys right you are a Wikipedia Nazi. I wrote an article about Carl Singebricks. You put up a speedy deletion thing at 22:01, 30 August 2005 because you said it was self-promotion and vanity. This is not true because I am not Carl Singebricks who was born in New York City. I live in Australia, NSW, Sydney, Concord West. Now I hope you are happy you have blocked me for 48 hours and have deleted everything on my article on Carl Singebricks. I would like to hear your response to this. Thankyou, Singie. 22:52, 2 September 2005 (UTC) (posted by on 07:52, 2 September 2005
 * You were blocked because you refused to follow Wikipedia policies, despite several warnings. Instead of discussing your article and the Speedy Delete notice with me (or any admin), you just went and removed the Speedy Delete notice. Then you started a revert war on Concord West.
 * The reason your Carl Singebricks article was deleted was not because I thought it was about yourself, but because it met criterion A7 of the speedy deletion policy:
 * An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance.
 * Read my note again: I said "If this article is about yourself, please move it to your User page."
 * Whether I'm a "Wikipedia Nazi" or not, you'll find that if you keep engaging in revert wars or arbitrarily removing tags placed by others, you'd keep getting blocked and eventually kicked out of this community. If you are willing to follow our (very reasonable!) guidelines and policies, and become a contributing member, we would all welcome you here. Owen&times; 13:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Bureaucratship
Hi, OwenX. Thank you so much for your support and kind words on my bureaucratship nomination. Unfortunately, it didn't pass, but I intend to run again soon. If you'd like to be informed next time around, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks again! Andre ( talk ) 05:25, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

User Page
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I was away and only just noticed it. CambridgeBayWeather 23:55, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Degania has two he: interwiki links
Hello, Wikipedia:Babel lists you as a Hebrew speaker.

I notice that Degania has two he: interwiki links. Can you check and verify this? Thanks. -- Curps 18:51, 6 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Fixed. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:08, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

User talk:202.72.148.102
Yes, it was intentional: the notice at the top of the page indicates that the IP is shared by many users, there's no reason to keep all those old warnings, and they would probably confuse the person whom I intended to warn. This is common practice with widely-shared IPs. &mdash; Dan | Talk 01:35, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

ulayiti's RfA
Hi Owen, and thanks for your support and the kind words you left at my RfA. I'm an administrator now, and I hope that I'll live up to the community's expectations as one. Your vote of confidence is much appreciated. - ulayiti (talk)  15:46, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi OwenX. Thanks for your support on my RfA and for the congratulations. Vandals had better beware RC patrol! Please do keep an eye on me and my log, and let me know if I slip up, or if I can help out. Thanks again. -Splash 13:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Meaning of Tetragrammaton
Hello,

Another Hebrew question:

I am was once a redirect to God, created by User:Sam Spade, on the grounds that the English translation of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton was "I am". However, our own Wikipedia article on it says that the meaning of these four Hebrew characters is very much open to interpretation, rather than having a simple "I am" translation.

The I am page is now a disambiguation page. I have posted a comment at Talk:I am... perhaps you can supply some authoritative information?

-- Curps 20:00, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello Sir
Yes Hi how are you doing? I'm Andréa. Just one question why did you delete my New York article? If you are Jewish you might know this yourself..I'm jewish from Brasil and wroted articles on anal sex in Brasil and other stuff I know about thank you.Wiki brah 05:17, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't play coy with me, Andréa. Your "article" about anal sex in New York was already deleted more than once in the past, and you have received a temporary block after ignoring admins' warnings. Keep this up and I can promise you a more permanent ban. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Heh. No.
No worries. Mike and Dori are two different people. We'll just fix that on back up, then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.14.230 (talk • contribs) Re: Articles for deletion/Jared M. Gordon 00:50, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

BDSM
''Why did you revert the last change on BDSM? The new wording by 64.228.63.101 does seem more NPOV. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:55, 12 September 2005 (UTC)''
 * I actually didn't object to the neutrality of the new wording. The old wording and the new wording seem to be trying to say something along the same lines.  However, the new wording refers to vanilla sex, which does not seem to be contextually correct.  Vanilla sex, according to the article on the subject, implies plain sex, which does not look like how it is being used.  I'm really not familiar with BDSM or the term Vanilla Sex, so if you think the new wording was better, feel free to revert back to it. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 02:19, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Good point! I'll try to come up with better wording or a different wikilink. Owen&times;  &#9742;  02:24, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Bmicomp's RfA
Well, my RfA has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 18:25, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Jorn Barger edits: User:Huneric
also made Jorn Barger–related edits similar to those made by anon IPs which you reported as vandalism. I added mention of this to the Vandalism in progress report. -- Curps 18:50, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert!
Hey, thanks for the quick revert. I was editing at the time, so I didn't spot it. I have no idea who that was, or what I did to them! -Splash 00:45, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Watch/schoolwatch/Sidaway ratio
I edited it to reflect my take on things, but I don't think this is really ready for prime time. If you don't mind, I'd just as soon delete it. --Tony Sidaway Talk 16:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your diligent attention to matters concerning my RfA, which I have formally withdrawn. The full text of my withdrawal and statement of appreciation is on the RfA page. Sincerely, Leonard G. 03:59, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Thank You
Your courtesy in enquiring if I could create an account is appreciated and is the kind of attitude required for Wikipedia to work. In fact I have been adding articles to Wikipedia since 2001 and am delighted that many of my early entries such as 'kangaroo' have matured into fine articles. However, Wikipedia also has a weakness, which is if a subject becomes of interest to a clique of bigot Wikipedians and there are more members (including sock puppets) of that clique than there are real writers for the subject.

For a popular subject such as 'Jerusalem' there were more Wikipedians than trouble makes, and so a revert-war would always end in the bigots lossing their attempted control of the article. But in the case of a little known or understood subject such as 'West Papua' there were 3 bigots (plus a sock puppet when needed) against only two real authors; so the bigots were able to maintain control of the subject and cast the 'black' people as dumb natives too stupid to be able to do what the American forefathers had done in the eighteenth century.

Although I eventually managed to get another Wikipedian to help attempt a 'mediation', they like other genuine Wikipedians did not want to contribute to the articles content because they did not know about the subject themselves. This of course did not stop the clique who admitted they'd never heard of West Papua before they noticed its title in the recent changes one day.

As you would know, it takes a great deal of time & effort to write a quality balanced article; and I simply have much more important things to do with my time. My work has probably been critical in getting the US Congress to write Section 1115, and will save many many thousands of West Papuan lives and their cultures.

Normally, I would not consider a section of some US Bill to warrent a Wikipedia article; however in this case there is a concerted effort by the Indonesian government and senior members of the US government to overturn the Congress and Senate majority and keep the US public from hearing about the issue. I therefore decided that an article about Section 1115 was in line with what Jimbo Wales has specified as an important part of its function.

- Sorry for length of entry but I feel this weakness of the Wikipedian system does need to be understood by more people. Best Regards.211.30.95.182 03:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

No problem
No problem. The only reason why I didn't block him again then is because that's an AOL IP, and the latest attack had been an hour before I found it. If the attacks to your User page become constant (hopefully not), I can protect the page for you, for as long as you like, while this guy either shapes up or moves on. Just let me know. Regards, Redux 16:44, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

HI :)
You are quite wrong just check out work i did on Nazis, Hunter S. Thompson stuff and this new one: Flaps 40. The reason I made so much aritcle about Sex and Drugs in Brasil and South America is becuase I know a lot about it and Lukcy 96 wouldn't let me write no more South Park shit.Wiki brah 17:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Regara
Regara is not a sockpuppet of User: KINGA QUEINZ!. All the Riven vandals are ultimately sockpuppets of User: Regara, including USER: KINGA QUEINZ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Someone... (talk • contribs) 02:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

subst:
Don't forget to substitute templates with section headers (such as  and  ) when you use them on talk pages: it reduces server load, and prevents accidental blanking of the template. -- Phroziac (talk) 18:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Swamp Ass
I changed my mind as it might have a home if cleaned up and relocated to slang or the like. Speedy it if you like. I will not object. Jwissick 23:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

more Barger vandal
-- Curps 00:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Yo man WTF.
Why do you want my article to be deleted? That does NOT come from the manual, i didn't have to post what it was for, so stop acting like you know everything. i just know how to write like an adult, which you are clearly not acting like one, if you even are an adult. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.89.194 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

King of the Hill
Hi there - I initially blocked the IP you reported for 15 minutes. Then, I took this off, and blocked for 24 hours. Thanks for your sharp eye on vandalism! --HappyCamper 21:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Block length increased to 48 hours across all the sockpuppets...anything else I can do to help out? Perhaps protect a few pages for a day or two? --HappyCamper 22:44, 24 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Ah ha! Check this out: User talk:63.19.146.69 - this might explain a few things, like why the IP keeps jumping around all over the place. --HappyCamper 19:53, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Yup. This vandal isn't going to get away this easily - wasted enough of everyone's time already! :-) --HappyCamper 22:07, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Hey there. You think it's a good time to unblock those pages now? --HappyCamper 10:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)


 * All unprotected...I will be gone from the Wiki for a little bit, but will return tomorrow. All yours! :-) --HappyCamper 01:00, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

My RFA
I want to thank you very much for your vote on my RFA. Greatly apperciated, I owe you one!   Journalist   C./ '''Holla @ me!

the king of the hill troll is back
the king of the hill troll is back want me to send him a pic of Goatse.cx?

signed CD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.241.245.49 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 24 September 2005

biased
OwenX is biased against low carb diets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.194.122 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Signing for you
No worries. I've done it myself. We're all human :-) --Durin 22:19, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Why are you deleting Coors Extra Gold??? why does Coors Light have its own page, but extra gold cant?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkurgan (talk • contribs) 20:21, 25 September 2005
 * Where do you see a page for Coors Light? All I see there now is a redirect to Coors Brewing Company, which is exactly what I did with the C.E.G. "article", that had nothing in it except the name and manufacturer. That information is all included in the Coors Brewing Company article. Owen&times;  &#9742;  01:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Corporate Knowledge
Thanks - I should have read to the bottom. It was just too painful. Dl yo ns 493  Ta lk  20:45, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. This isn't my favourite reading material either. I could barely get myself to the second paragraph... :) Owen&times; &#9742;  20:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Teudat Zehut
I provided full explanation on Talk:Teudat Zehut. I wouldn't just omit without explaining. Magister 21:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Rogerd
I have posted the following reply to your comments:

I would like to take issue with that comment. I have worked in information technology for 27 years and have dealt with disaffected users, fellow programmers, subordinates and superiors on a regular basis. I may not have done a lot of communicating with other users in wikipedia as of yet, but I assure you I have handled this kind of thing. I know how to stand my ground when needed, and I would do so. --Rogerd 00:26, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


 * I believe you! I am sure that in real life you can stand your ground, present your opinion, and get your thought across to your audience. However, here on Wikipedia, we have seen very little of that. You concentrate your efforts on editing articles, which is&mdash;without doubt&mdash;the most important job here. We don't have any way to gauge your conversational abilities, or the manner in which you treat people, based on what we've seen on WP. I find the terse way in which you answered the RfA questions troubling, especially considering this is a self-nomination. I could be wrong, but my guess is that you'd find the amount of correspondence required from you as a WP admin simply overwhelming. I would rather have you here as a productive editor than as a swamped admin. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:00, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Owen X-- I don't understand--I did not mean to commit any kind of "vandalism", so I don't understand why you deleted my well-intentioned edit with the comment: "rvv and bump counter. that was pointless, wasn't it?", when all I did was delete the part of the top of the page that looks like it has been overwritten and is barely legible. I thought that that was what you meant by your page having been vandalized 9 times (or so), and to please "revert" if any vandalism was noticed (thus giving your permission). Have you seen what the top of the page looks like--it looks terrible. I just wanted to help; it looked much nicer afterwards. I think you need to take a look at the top of your page and see what has been overwritten and illegible.

67.101.192.69 01:02, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

By the way--are you Irish Catholic (I'm just wondering because I am also) given your first and middle names, which are quite Hibernian, Owen "X" (Xavier??) -- (Owen Xavier??).

I am at Kinko's now, so Slainte, Angela Mc
 * I am terribly sorry! I deal with User page vandalism so often that sometimes I misinterpret a genuine attempt to improve. The page looks fine on a couple of machines I tried it with. Which browser are you using to view it? Once again, my apologies for my harsh reaction, and thank you for your input! Owen&times; &#9742;  01:14, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Mozilla Firefox and the top of the page still looks terrible like some kind of Wiki graffiti or something. What about what I asked you--I find Irish Catholic guys really attractive, even if they have Canadian accents -- Colm Feore, Allan Rock, Kevin Lowe, Brendan Shanahan, Paolo Costanzo (OK he's Italian, I couldn't think of any more Irish guys)!! CHEERS!! 67.101.192.69 01:30, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Looks fine now--why would you have a German accent--were you raised in Germany or Austria?? 67.101.192.69 01:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Adminship
Hey, we haven't spoken in the past (AFAIK), but I noticed you do alot of hard work (saw your reverting some vandalism during my RC patrol), and I was wondering if you would be interested in adminship? I'd love to nominate you. Let me know :). -Greg Asche (talk) 01:35, 30 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Alright, I nominated you at Requests for adminship/OwenX. Please answer the questions if you wouldn't mind, and good luck. -Greg Asche (talk) 01:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)



Dancing Links
You added a notice to Dancing Links saying it should be merged with linked list. Why? Dancing Links is a particular algorithm that uses linked lists. Please explain the reasoning behind your merge request, as it makes no sense to me. --Graue 03:03, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The article in its current form is just a one-sentence definition. If it can be expanded into more than that, it makes sense to leave it on its own. Otherwise, I'd rather add it as a one-line external link (to Knuth's article) on the Linked list page. Please note that other than a comment in Sudoku, nothing links (sorry about the pun...) to this article. On Linked list, at least people would find it. Dancing Links is an important topic--don't get me wrong! I just want to find a good home for this stub. Owen&times;  &#9742;  03:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

I have created a new article, called exact cover. (Perhaps it should instead be named "exact cover problem"? I used the name "exact cover" because that is what was used in List_of_NP-complete_problems.)  The only reason I mention that I created this article is because it now has a link pointing to the Dancing Links article. (I just read Donald Knuth's paper for the first time today; pretty cool!) I'm not sure however what Knuth meant by "dancing links": was the name meant to refer specifically to his algorithm that solved the exact cover problem, or is it meant to be a general term referring to nodes popping in and out of existence in a linked list? User:Sciolizer 08:42, 3 October 2005 (GMT-6)

Who's RfA
Thank you for supporting my masters RfA. He appreciates your support and comments and looks forward to better serving Wikipedia the best he can. Of course I will be doing all of the real work. He would have responded to you directly, but he is currently out of town, and wanted to thank you asap. Thanks again. --Who's mop?&iquest;? 20:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)