User talk:Owen Ambur

AfD nomination of Utility theory of value
I have nominated Utility theory of value, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Utility theory of value. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SlamDiego&#8592;T 19:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Strategy Markup Language
A tag has been placed on Strategy Markup Language requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 00:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Fair enough; they are your words, and it is a government site. I apologize strongly for not verifying the copyright violation notice, and have undeleted the article. --Golbez (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Strategy Markup Language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Thomas85753 16:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strategy Markup Language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stakeholder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I meant to refer to the disambiguation page since none of the individual pages adequately or explicitly covers the meaning of the term "stakeholder" in the context of the StratML standard. For example, the Stakeholder (corporate) page comes closest but usage of the standard is not limited to corporations. Indeed, it is primarily focused on organizations whose plans and reports should be public, e.g., government agencies and tax-exempt charities. Also, in StratML Part 3, we plan to explicitly enable the usage of the standard to document "projects" (and programs) as special types of organizations. So the Stakeholder (project) page is also relevant.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Control myths (January 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Control myths and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Owen_Ambur Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Owen_Ambur reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Control myths concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Control myths, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Control myths


Hello, Owen Ambur. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Control myths".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Machine-Readable Documents
 * added links pointing to Content, Machine-readable, GPRA and Blockchain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machine-Readable Documents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reliability. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply: I left the link to the disambiguation page in the See Also section because multiple definitions of the term "Reliability" are applicable. If anyone else wants to remove it, that would be fine with me, but from my perspective, it is useful to help make the point.

October 2017
Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Strategy Markup Language. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 17:29, 14 October 2017 (UTC)