User talk:Owen Other

AfD nomination of Micro-Park
Micro-Park, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Micro-Park satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Micro-Park and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Micro-Park during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 21:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Campus Disorientation
Hello Owen Other,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Campus Disorientation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Campus Disorientation
Hello Owen Other,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Campus Disorientation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Please don't remove speedy delete notices from articles you've created. You can contest the deletion on the talk paeg. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Owen Other, I just wanted to let you know as the reviewing administrator that I declined the speedy deletion request on the grounds that this was not about an "organized event" (instead, it is about a neologism). However, my decision was based on the wrong procedure was used.  An editor may still choose to nominate this article for a deletion discussion (see WP:Articles for deletion).  Also, as Barney the barney barney noted above, please remember not to remove speedy deletion tags from articles you have created. Thanks! Singularity42 (talk) 23:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Campus Disorientation
Hello, Owen Other,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Campus Disorientation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Campus Disorientation.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)