User talk:Own Your Word and Learn From All

 <div style="background-color: Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.  Happy editing!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)   Hello, Own Your Word and Learn From All, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * 1) E2F9ED;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) A3BFB1;color:black;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting started
 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
 * 1) E2F9ED;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) A3BFB1;color:black;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Finding your way around
 * Table of contents
 * Directories and indexes
 * Department directory
 * 1) E2F9ED;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) A3BFB1;color:black;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Editing articles
 * How to develop an article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * 1) E2F9ED;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) A3BFB1;color:black;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting help
 * Frequently asked questions
 * Cheatsheet
 * Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
 * The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
 * Help pages
 * Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * 1) E2F9ED;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) A3BFB1;color:black;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How you can help
 * Community Portal
 * Join a WikiProject
 * Follow Wikipedia etiquette
 * Practice civility
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American Council of Trustees and Alumni. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are engaging in WP:COATRACK.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at American Principles Project, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 *  Comment from blocking admin - To answer #2, please see WP:ADMIN. This is not a "perception of value". I blocked you because you were disruptively copy-pasting the same quote into these articles, yet the quote is unrelated to the articles. You are trying to make an argument that X is part of Y and someone in Y said FUBAR, therefore FUBAR belongs on X's page. But that is WP:COATRACKing. The quote belongs on Kevin Roberts (political strategist)'s article and maybe on Project 2025. There is no reason to spam it on 100s of other pages. It appears that you have some agenda or point motivating your editing, trying to associate these hundreds of organizations with a vile (yes, that's my perception) statement by Roberts.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 21:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

- Again, You have not directly addressed my question on the paragraph I appended which is on 100+ pages. How is that not "spamming" as you call it but the quote I appended to the paragraph is? The quote is directly related to the article as these people work for each other and have a professional business relationship. How is it that the affiliation is ok to be cited on 100+ pages but a quote from the president of the affiliation not?

- Your response was that it had no value. These are your words. I asked about your words.

- Most important, I have provided no opinion on the matter. You did. I simply copied a quote.

You Own Your Word and Learn From All (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Not every statement needs to be an unblock request, only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 07:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)