User talk:Oxford pictionary

Hello, Oxford pictionary, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

File permission problem with File:JennaMourey.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JennaMourey.jpg, which you've sourced to Jenna Mourey. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Your article Passage du milieu
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Passage du milieu to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. RubinkumarTalk 05:44, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Oxford pictionary: I'm a bit puzzled. You quite correctly did not create the article here in French, but instead wrote a stub on the topic in English (all as it says in Translation). However, your first version of the page merely consisted of a sentence stating the article exists on French Wikipedia. That was a bit strange. Why didn't you wait till you'd written the stub? Also, where on French Wikipedia? The article fr:Passage du milieu is on the Middle Passage, as demonstrated by its interwikis; it just uses two references about the film (which for some reason you didn't make use of - I have done so). The film may well be notable, so thank you for writing about it, but I'm scratching my head here ... Yngvadottir (talk) 13:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

The Devil Wears Prada as chick lit
Per your comment here, I have restored the term with the addition of two sources, one a newspaper article and the other a collection of feminist literary criticism on the subject, that describe The Devil Wears Prada as chick lit. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, but per your edit summary, I have two issues to raise:
 * Why do this just for the article on probably the most successful book in the genre? A number of other articles, some of them also about individual works, use the term. If we make this change, it should be done globally.
 * Putting it in scare quotes and referring to it attributively is POV. I'm not saying that not doing that isn't POV. But if we make a change like this we need some good reasons why and a strong consensus behind them. Especially when the chick lit article, as it currently stands, does not mention any of your criticisms in its criticism section (which is not to say they're not valid). Why not add some material to that section, and start the discussion at Talk:Chick lit? Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Alton Towers
Was there really any point in making these 2 edits ?

Please stop editing in a disruptive manner otherwise you'll find yourself blocked for quite a long time,

Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 16:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hits (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Under the Radar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kidnapping of Jaycee Dugard
Hi, Oxford pictionary. Thank you for your recent edits. They are very helpful indeed. Cheers! 06:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

NNDB as a source
Hi Oxford pictionary. I noticed that you recently used nndb.com as a source for biographical information in Edward Furlong. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)