User talk:Oxygenix2004

Spam in NutriSciences
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on NutriSciences, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because NutriSciences is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting NutriSciences, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Mark J. Tallon PhD
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mark J. Tallon PhD, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Mark J. Tallon PhD appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mark J. Tallon PhD has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mark J. Tallon PhD and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mark J. Tallon PhD with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mark J. Tallon PhD.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.
 * Note: I am just the messenger.  I did not place the tag.  However, I did verify that with only minor rewording that does not eliminate the copyright violation, the PDF file does match the article. Also, as written, the article does not demonstrate notability to the standards of Notability, Notability (people), or Notability (academics).  Even if the article were rewritten to address the copyright issues, if the notability issues were not addressed, it would very likely be deleted after a discussion at Articles for deletion.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  19:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)