User talk:OzEditor

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan John Miller ("Jesus")
A tag has been placed on Alan John Miller ("Jesus"), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Alan John Miller ("Jesus") and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 12:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale
You wrote, The original Wiki article was deleted as not sufficient evidence AJ exists. That is not, and has never been, a valid rationale for deletion. The Loch Ness Monster doesn't exist, yet no one would think about deleting the article on it. Please read WP:EXISTENCE and keep in mind that blogs and forums are not considered reliable to establish a subject's notability. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

BlanchardB, you can read the experience of the original author here. http://www.youngausskeptics.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=131. I am attempting to add more info including criticisms. --OzEditor (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a blog. Therefore you can't use that. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at what it is that we consider reliable sources. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I was pointing you to the blog to highlight the author's experience with trying to get an article on wikipedia in the first place. The blog itself is not the evidence that AJ exists. I simply used his basic article as a starting point. I am doing original research on AJ Miller, and I realise I cannot publish original research here, so I am attempting to source third-party discussions about him. The facts are, his teachings are available on his website and on youtube. The yahoo group and yahoo message board, at this time, are the only sources of third party discussion about him.--OzEditor (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem is that message boards that anyone can edit are not considered reliable sources either. Please note that I am not questioning the man's existence, but rather his notability. Please read WP:EXISTENCE as instructed above. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)