User talk:Ozan192

You are being warned
Please refrain from tendentious editing by removing native names of Armenian and Kurdish villages and exclaiming that Armenians shouldn't edit Turkey related topics. If you continue with your disruptive edits, I will send you to ANI and you may be blocked from editing. Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Was that a joke. I'm not going to allow Kurds and Armenians to vandalize pages to do with Turkey. Wikipedia is an objective encyclopedia and since both Armenians and Kurds lack objectivity on anything to do with Turkey sources originating from them cannot be sourced.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Reported
I warned you. You continued. Now I have reported you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 01:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality, personal attacks against other users, and generally not being here to write an encyclopedia. The diffs supplied in the ANI discussion clearly show an unwillingness to work with others, and blatant POV editing. You cannot simply say "every source from this ethicity/country is unreliable". You also cannot accuse other editors in edit summaries without evidence, simply because you don't like what they do. Should you be willing to agree to edit according to our policies, you can be unblocked, but you're going to need to show a complete change in attitude.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Im going to report for adding unsourced information onto Wikipedia. You will understand that this isn't your ultra nationalist playground. ,


 * Ozan, just to save you a little more time, let me be clear exactly why you were blocked:


 * You attacked other editors in edit summaries and on talk pages, calling them "irredentist nationalists" without any evidence of that.
 * You edit warred to keep your version in Wikipedia.
 * You failed to discuss the matter civilly to attempt to reach consensus.
 * You rejected sources for no reason whatsoever, other than that they didn't conform to your preferred version.
 * You rejected other sources because of the ethnicity/nationality of the author, making a blanket claim that all people of that ethnicity/nationality must be biased. That is contrary to both policy and basic common sense.
 * Note that none of these says you were blocked for adding or removing certain names. You could be right in the underlying content dispute--maybe those names don't belong in Wikipedia. If you want to help show why that is, you need to commit to a major change in behavior. If your next unblock request does not address these issues, then your talk page access will be removed, as, at this point, you're just wasting administrator's time by continuing the behavior that warranted the block in the first place. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * That still does not address the reasons you were blocked - personal attacks, edit warring, ethnic insults. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)