User talk:Ozianscott

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Barry m (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Fair use rationale for Image:Live.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Live.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Live.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Live.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Judy Room
A tag has been placed on The Judy Room requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 05:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page The Wizard of Oz (1939 film) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Leuko Talk/Contribs 01:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Leuko Talk/Contribs 02:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Leuko Talk/Contribs 02:41, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 02:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Judy Garland. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ''Despite the repeated removals of the link you've been adding you've persisted in adding it. See WP:EL for guidelines on external links, in particular the part at WP:ELNO.'' —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)


 * This wasn't a spam link that I inserted. I was re-inserting the link that had been there for years, but was somehow deleted.  It's definitely not spam.  Ozianscott (talk) 16:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It was there for years because you added it, on several occasions, as you did to other articles. It was deleted because The Judy Room is a fan site that doesn't supplement the Wikipedia article as a source of information about Garland so much as it acts as a sales portal for Garland memorabilia, complete with affiliate identifiers in the links. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Did the rules change? The link was put there a long time ago. The site is an information site that provides additional details and information about her life and career - it's used by many as a research tool. Linking to it gives people the chance to find out more information about her life and career. It's not a sales site at all. I have links to Amazon for people to purchase items they're reading about, but that's it. It's less a sales site than The Judy Garland Museum, which is still linked. They would be considered for profit more than I would ever be with my Amazon links. It doesn't make sense that the link is suddenly removed after all this time, it certainly wasn't hindering anything.Ozianscott (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Judy Garland discography has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Judy Garland discography was changed by Ozianscott (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2020-02-06T18:54:01+00:00

Judy Garland Decca albums
Hello, I saw your recent edits in Judy Garland Discography and I would like to ask in what you based to say that the Decca albums of Judy like The Wizard of Oz, Girl Crazy and Meet Me in St. Louis are not soundtrack albums? Why definition are you using to say that? Even the album Glitter by Mariah Carey is considered a soundtrack album. I definitely didn't understand what you did in that article. If you don't explain me I'll revert your editions.--88marcus (talk) 03:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)



You didn't give me much time to respond before changing the edits back. The Decca Records albums are comprised of studio recordings made at the Decca Records studios. Soundtrack albums are comprised of songs/scoring prerecorded and used in films. The Decca albums are, and have always been known as, studio albums. The first soundtrack album ever released was 1947's "Till The Clouds Roll By" released by MGM Records. It is historically known as the first soundtrack album ever released.

The confusion over the Decca albums is common but they are, in fact, studio albums and have never even been promoted or listed as soundtracks.

Please note that I run The Judy Garland Online Discography Ozianscott (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok, I think I understand, my bad, sorry.--88marcus (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem! It can get confusing. :) Ozianscott (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Decca Albums
You didn't give me much time to respond before changing the edits back! The Decca Records albums are comprised of studio recordings made at the Decca Records studios. Soundtrack albums are comprised of songs/scoring prerecorded and used in films. The Decca albums are and have always been known as studio albums. The first soundtrack album was 1947's "Till The Clouds Roll By". It is historically known as the first soundtrack album ever released. The confusion over the Decca albums is common but they are, in fact, studio albums and have never even been promoted or listed as soundtracks. I run The Judy Garland Online Discography Ozianscott (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC) User:88marcus