User talk:Ozone742

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Veronica Lueken have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Veronica Lueken was changed by Ozone742 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887797 on 2022-02-02T01:26:55+00:00

April 2022
Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pachamama, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Veverve. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Veverve. You made a mistake by removing my edit on Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. All my edit did was clarify that Fenneyism is condemned as a heresy by the Catholic Church. Not including it would be witholding information and taking away the neutral point of view that Wikipedia is supposed to have. Thank you. Ozone742 (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You called it "a condemned heresy" and also a "heresy". Those are not clarifications. The opinion the Catholic Church has on Feeneyism is already explained at length at the Feeneyism WP article. Veverve (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * What exactly do you consider "clarification" if not clarifying what the given subject is? Feeneyism is a condemned heresy. Mentioning it in this article is relevent to the subject and gives readers a quick understanding of it. Just mentioning that this fact is pointed out on another article is irrelvant. Wikipedia articles frequently include information from other articles when necessary. Which would be the case here. Ozone742 (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The opinion the Catholic Chuch has on Feeneyism, imiaslavie, sola fide or any other doctrine is most of the time irrelevant outside of some specific sections in some articles, and are always the opinion of the Catholic Church and not facts. Veverve (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You think the opinion of the Catholic Church isn't relevant to a section about the Church's opinions on Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus? Sorry, but that's false. Ozone742 (talk) 19:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added a more neutral wording for the EENS article. Veverve (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You just added the same information I did but at the end of the paragraph. That's no different. Ozone742 (talk) 19:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)