User talk:Ozzfinds

Additions of http://.pandorabraceletsusa.com related
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
 * http://www.thejewelking.com/articledetail.php?artid=114&catid=366&title=Determining+Platinum+Content+and+Marks
 * http://www.iusapress.com/html/2005/08/15/the-story-of-platinum.html
 * http://searchwarp.com/swa248190.htm
 * http://searchwarp.com/swa336719.htm

Wikipedia is NOT a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Hu12 (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Response to Hu12
Is it the validity of the articles that is being called into question, or is it that the articles were written and published by a single company? I make no attempts to advertise the company in my contributions to Wikipedia, it just happens they've put links to their website in their articles. I don't understand how my use of their articles can be construed as advertising.

Ozzfinds (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Both. All your contributions are pandorabraceletsusa.com related. First the links Fails Wikipedia's core content policies:
 * ”Verifiability”
 * ” Questionable_sources”
 * "Verifiable Reliable Sources"
 * ”Self-published sources (online and paper)”
 * ”Reliable sources”
 * ”Self-published sources”
 * Secondly, some additional rules:
 * External links policy
 * Links normally to be avoided
 * Advertising and conflicts of interest
 * Conflict of interest
 * Editors who have a conflict of interest
 * Accounts used for promotion
 * Law Of Unintended Consequences
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Wikipedia is not a repository for links
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising
 * BLOCK
 * Persistent spamming
 * Accounts that appear, based on their edit history, to exist for the sole or primary purpose of promoting a person, company, product, service, or organization in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines.--Hu12 (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Very well. Sorry for taking up your time.

Ozzfinds (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)