User talk:Ozzie1021

Welcome
Hello, Ozzie1021. Welcome to Wikipedia. I am ТимофейЛееСуда a volunteer with the Account Creation Team and I received your account request. You are welcome to leave questions, comments on my talk page at anytime  here . Here is some useful information to get you started. – ТимофейЛееСуда (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sancto express


A tag has been placed on Sancto express requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 18:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kulula.com destinations with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ISTB351 (talk) 17:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove redlinks that are fully compliant with the provisions of WP:REDLINK, as you have done at least twice in Airlink. Thanks. Roger (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm asking you again - please do not remove legitimate redlinks from articles as you have done yet again on the Airlink page. Please read WP:REDLINK. Roger (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mighty Men's Conference


The article Mighty Men's Conference has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 02:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LAM Mozambique Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 18:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove the parenthetical "(suspended)" note in the airlines and destinations lists of the airports that were served by Velvet Sky unless you have a reliable source that confirms they have resumed flights. I have searched for such information but found none. Roger (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your edits to the articles of airports that are destinations of Velvet Sky (airline) are disruptive. Please enter into discussions about your intentions and cooperate with other editors. Please also provide meaningful edit summaries for your edits. Roger (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Mango's wifi
We cannot go on doing this to and fro reverting each other on the Mango (airline) article - we must solve this problem.

So let me explain exactly why I believe your edit is problematic.

Your change removes information that is cited from a Reliable Source, www.itweb.co.za, which is a recognised specialist news website covering IT.

The information you are putting in is taken from a facebook page. Facebook is not always acceptable as a source - see WP:FACEBOOK. If you can find another source, preferably not from Mango itself, that is at least as acceptable as itweb and definitely better than facebook, please use it to support the update.

It is definitely not that I don't believe that Mango has started the wifi service, it is purely a case that an edit cannot replace fully reliable information with less reliable info.

A different problem is that you never post an edit summary to explain your edits. Edits without summaries are often percieved to be problematic - for example, vandals typically never post edit summaries. It also creates the impression that you are not willing to co-operate with other editors. So please, I'm begging you, remember to post an edit summary. You also need to read other people's edit summaries and respond to them if necessary - something you have not done in this case. I tried to explain my action every time but you revert it without comment - that can be interpreted as a hostile act.

Please let us work together to improve the articles we are both interested in. Roger (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kenya Airways, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 00:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Eritrean Airlines, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ''Your edit was reverted given that you did not provide a valid reason for removing a reliable reference as Aerotransport.org actually is. Furthermore, the use of a table in the fleet section is not justified given the little amount of information that is shown there.'' Jetstreamer Talk 21:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Jetstreamer Talk 23:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)