User talk:P,TO 19104

iS THERE ANY EASY WAY TO CREATE ARCHIVE IN TALK PAGE
Hi sir, Noticed in your talk page you create archives very professionally, is there any easy way to create archives like this or by normal edit process you are doing it. Rahul SomanDiscussions - contribs 23:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Enough citations on '68 (film)?
Hi! I found '68 (film) in the LGBT articles for improvement. I added some reviews from the 1980s. Does that seem like enough to remove the "more citations" template? Thanks! KarenJoyce (talk) 19:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wigund-Jeronym Trubecki
Hello, P,TO 19104. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wigund-Jeronym Trubecki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Please don't delete, but give a hint to improve
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:J._Paul_Morrison is the man behind a very important thing in IT: FBP. I've tried to get both his page and his wikidata Q-thing good enough, but wikipedia's datamodel and social rules are really foreign to me. In september I see my colleague again who has loads of experience on many wikimedia projects. Steltenpower (talk) 22:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but I think this particular article deserves deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia’s General notability guideline, which requires an article to have multiple secondary references that provide significant coverage on the subject. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 10:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I have a link to an obituary, I have a link to the book (editions) he wrote (of which I read one), I know he exists (I met him and spoke on the subject), there's a Google Group on FBP of which some members met him too and where his widow is reachable under his old address.
 * And with some time and proper device/connection access, which I'll have in September I'm sure I'll dig up more. My librarian friend/colleague who knows how to work Wikipedia properly returns from vacation the same month.
 * I'm sure WP's guidelines on content are great, I wouldn't want a lousy article on this computer science giant, but a bit more patience would be nice.
 * [I will not start a new article when I don't have an experienced editor right next to me, it's complicated] Steltenpower (talk) 14:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I recommend you seek help from your friend on this matter, and before creating other articles. Regarding obituaries, they typically do not qualify as reliable sources (though there are exceptions if they are in mainstream newspapers). I'll check back in on the article in September. Good luck! P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Sic erat scriptum" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sic_erat_scriptum&redirect=no Sic erat scriptum] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 22:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Karl Lagerfeld edit requests
Hi Wikipedia editors, Hope you are well. I wanted to reach out to you regarding the Documentary claim request on the Karl Lagerfeld page. I noticed you marked the edit as answered. However I have changed the request to unanswered as the update has not been made.

Would it be possible to kindly review the request in question along with the other outstanding requests on the same page, that will be really appreciated!

Thank you MB for KARL LAGERFELD (talk) 09:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @MB for KARL LAGERFELD I will look into fulfilling this request as soon as I can. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 13:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Unarchiving discussions on Talk:2024 Indian general election
Hi

I'm not sure why you unarchived all the discussions at that talk page but going through them in order -
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 - Asked for editing results, already done + also answered explicitly
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 (2) - Asked to edit a line about sensex, that line does not exist anymore (current line on article is neutral)
 * Wrong photo of the leader - Was not backed with RS, would have been auto-closed after a quick reply. Arguably could be unarchived
 * Unable to edit - Editor asked about edit restrictions, editor was answered.
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 (3) - ER was answered, also line is changed already
 * NDA is 292 - Section is outdated, there's another section afterwards that discussed and was answering the same thing
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 (4) - ER was answered, article was changed
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 (5) - ER was never answered, should have been unarchived
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 (6) - ER was answered, editor was advised to gain consensus
 * Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2024 (7) - ER didnt have a question at all
 * NDA Tally - Said "section afterwards". Editor making ER confirmed article was changed already.

Out of the 11 sections you restored as "edit requests that have not been answered", only 1 to 2 have really not been. I'd archived them all mainly to avoid clutter on an already massive and hectic talk page. Could you explain how they've not been answered? Else I would recommend re-archiving everything apart from those 2 sections Soni (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Good day: I am currently addressing Edit Request 5 June 2024 (5). I restored the above discussions merely to keep continuity in the archives. I will restore the archive shortly. Sorry for any confusion. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 18:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Understandable. I think it could have been simpler to just unarchive that section, and re-archive it in the correct place. But cool, thanks for fixing that missed archive Soni (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Khalifa edit request
Hello, I responded to your reply on Khalifa's Talk Page and updated the request. Not sure if you saw it. Squaredtrig (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Bell Bank Edit request May 2024
Hi @P,TO 19104,

Thank you for your response on Bell Bank's "Edit request May 2024." You mentioned reasoning and reliable sources, and the reason we’ve requested to remove several of the sponsorships and endorsements is that those specific partnerships are no longer in place due to expiration of contracts. We are unable to share the contracts externally. We do hope the list can be updated, so that the page continues to present accurate and up-to-date information.

Thank you. WikiWriter1005 (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

About GregHenderson
Hello, @P,TO 19104. I just wanted to come and let you know that GregHenderson is a user who is temporary blocked from editing due to persistent issues with COIs and unsourced content. Make sure you check the sourcing of the content before adding the addition. While he has been an editor for a while, there are people and admins who are trying to teach them. is one of them if you have any questions. Thank you, Cowboygilbert  -  (talk) ♥  04:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @P,TO 19104, it does warrant a complete revert because this editor needs to learn the proper citing of text. Cowboygilbert  -  (talk) ♥  21:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)