User talk:P,TO 19104/Archive 6

BandLab
Just I heads up that the logo you put on the BandLab Technologies article is for the software and not the company. So I reverted it. I almost did an article for the software first, but I think that can come later. The company is more notable. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  07:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you for stopping by. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

List of bluey episodes (U.S. Version)
Even though Bluey, a Australian 2018 series airs in Australia... Can I make a list of episodes for when those episodes have been released in the united states? If no.. That's OK. DogetimeeAKABlueyFan (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes you can! To learn more about writing articles, you can go to WP:Writing your first article or learn more about being bold. If you have any other questions, you can direct your questions toward the WP:Teahouse or WP:Help desk. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Question
Bsd. Hi. First, I want to preface, that I'm not here to complain or challenge, but rather to get a better understanding. I've been offline recently, so I missed the discussion about I uploaded. In said discussion you assert that 'Author has a history of uploading bad files'. Logos are the primary focus of my contributions to Wikipedia, would you pleas elaborate on it, so I can improve? Thank you. --Ben Stone 19:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I might have been alluding to the amount of orphaned non-free image notices that seem to have collected on your talk page over the years. I have since struck that comment, because what I said, admittadely, was not fair to say. If I could give you advice to improve, I would say that you should upload images for companies with existing articles, rather than just uploading them for the future, which is something you probably understand. Sorry about that. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I assumed that's what you meant. The nature of non-free logos is such that they get obsolete as soon as there is a rebranding. Also, often companies will create articles about themselves, with a bad JPEG logo which I replace with a proper one, just to be deleted for blatant advertisement or no encyclopedic value. So I may appear to have uploaded for future articles when files are left behind, while the article itself is gone. --Ben Stone 20:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure! Also, if you don't want to recieve those B-bot notices, you can also opt out with Template:Bots. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I would, but occasionally it helps spotting vandalism or bad edits. --Ben Stone 20:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Labeouf
thanks. :) 173.85.194.46 (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

The Voice

 * Hello! Could you go to The Voice Australia and The Voice of Germany Talk Pages and see if you agree with some changes I'm proposing, please? Thank you :D

MarcioRob24 (Talk!) 16:55, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Cambio.com logo
Me again! I see you tagged File:Cambio.com logo.svg for discussion, but I don't see a link to the discussion page. As this file is free, and it's still relevant to the subject, I have re-added it to the article. --Ben Stone 23:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was a proposed deletion (it was PRODed because it was orphaned, and the company name change). Sounds goods! Removing PROD tag. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

 * Thank you! P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

COI template
Thank you P,TO 19104, made the template removal based on content clean up from previous user and removal of remaining internal source. Page seemed more neutral and sources are almost all external.
 * Sounds good! Thanks, P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

RE: FvD
The evidence for it is the fact that I am a member of the party in question. Unsure why you'd remove it anyway, considering you can literally see that he's the leader of the party here: https://www.parlement.com/id/vleeekvgpyf5/nieuws/baudet_gekozen_tot_fvd_partijleider

76% of the voters (28.269 of the total of 37.055 people who voted) voted to keep him in charge. As a matter of fact, that's already included in the party infobox as is. I see absolutely no reason why you'd remove this claim when it's already supported in the article.
 * See the FAQ. I reverted your edit because you did not provide a reliable source, where the burden of proof is on you, as the editor. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The first and second FAQ may be applicable, though not directly. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing - Donny & Marie Osmond.jpg
Hey there. I thought your closure of the FFD discussion as "kept" is too soon. Honestly, I'm not convinced that the "keep" arguments would suffice. One argued notability as sufficient, and the other is an uploader of the file. I think you should either relist it or reopen it without relisting. --George Ho (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I thought that would have been uncontriversial (it was my first WP:NAC). You know I thought that at some point on FFD there was some expectation that opinions from voters mean more (since there aren't as many people who vote at FFD)... ay.... All edits reverted, and I really would not want to make this a big deal. Thanks for your feedback and I will take it into account for future reference. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * With pleasure. Please note that admins have the tools to delete any page and file, and the admins will have been already aware of ongoing older discussions at WP:FFD and will decide which to relist properly and which to close. George Ho (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I thought I might save them some time on what would a less contriversial close. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

You have "accepted" an edit that is vandalism
It appears you have accepted this edit by IP 190.151.175.221. If you take a look at the page history and observed 190.151.175.221 gross alteration of the title of cited source to fit his edit you would have understood it is vandalism. I would have expected an experienced user to be more careful when accepting edits of blue-linked IP. Sincerely — Dentren &#124; Talk 01:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, it seems that acceptance of that edit was made in error, and if you look to my log entry that I made for this acceptance, you can see the reason why I accepted it. It was my understanding that the IP was only fixing the name of the chapter (and to be fair, it looked real since the country names were in Spanish). It would have also made sense that those countries would have looked to the Galapagos. Thanks for your feedback, as I have not come by a situation like this before. By the way - could you explain what link you're referring to when you are talking about a "blue link"; the IP user talk page or contribs? P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I mean that the link to the talk page is blue. IPs with blue-linked talkpages have often warnings. This kind of stealth vandalism is among the most dangerous. I am glad you are aware now. Hope you have a nice evening. Dentren &#124; Talk 01:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Reply
I did not edit the page, “Jane Swift,” insofar as I can remember. I do need help with citations! Thanks for the link.

Suzanne Marilley
 * Hi, the reason you were given that warning is because someone from your IP address, did in fact make an edit to Jane Swift, though it may not have been you personally. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Untitled
Hi you sent me a message as to revisions to the Ilfracombe website. I am a town councillor since 1999 and was the first editor for the Ilfracombe, site developing it in the early noughties. I also chaired the district economic development board The revisions I was making were to update the details and the progress changes made in the many years since. e.g. proposed developments are now either concrete structures (skateboard park) or not and people and their businesses have come and gone i.e. Hirst's restaurants etc Ta. --Frankpearson1
 * Hi, please see the User talk:P,TO 19104/FAQ; you are required to cite sources regardless if you are an expert on a certain topic, please see WP:RS and WP:NOR. Additionally, please declare your conflict of interest in accordance with the WMF's terms of service. It is recommended you do not edit articles directly. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Correct ping . P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Ilfracombe
The process required to make the changes means I'm sorry to have neither the time nor skill set. The page on our community Ilfracombe is simply way out of time with now incorrect, misleading legacy information. These legacy defects explain the negative comments as to Wikipedia made in several recent council meetings and the amusement at my championing Wikipedia. I've been a Wikipedia champion for near 16 years. As this will not be unique to this page I cannot use Wikipedia as a reference site All things come to an end. Best of luck.
 * Hi, I am sorry to see you leave Wikipedia, however, you should know that the policy of using reliable secondary sources has always been in place. You can get an introduction to editing at Help:Introduction, if I could convince you to stay. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 01:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Ilfracombe
There is content in the above referenced site which is incorrect and misleading. It should be either corrected or removed until corrections are made as it contains misleading false information. The Wiki claim to be accurate is a misnomer, as is your claim modifications need to be referenced without specification as to what is a reliable source. The local written media has significantly changed and sadly much of its content is scraped from other sites which have scant regard for facts. The claim made there has always been a requirement for referenced sources and it was ever thus is factually incorrect since when I developed the entry from a stub in early noughties it was then not a requirement, nor at other times since.

Untitled
Hi, I am trying to remove the reference to the Argentinian basketball team in the football section on the Golden Generation page. I clarified this on my second attempt. Basketball and football are different sports so I'm fairly sure it doesn't belong there, and there is already an Argentinian entry under the basketball section.
 * The problem with your edits is that you removed the entire section in the article on Argentina, instead of just removing the individual reference. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

The entire Argentina football section is pointless since its about the wrong sport (basketball). I could leave an empty stub but surely someone could add that if they wanted to add something on Argentinian football.

MARPAT
Hello,

In regards to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARPAT - if any content was removed it was unintentional. I was editing the page to add content. My father and his CO were the first Marines issued the new digital camo so I wanted to add that tidbit to the page along with a photo of him wearing it. I see the text is still present but the photo was removed. Do you mind if I add the photo back to the page?

ZM808 (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. The reason why your edit was reverted is because you removed a reference to a newspaper without proper explanation. As long as you don't do that again, you can be bold. Thanks, P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Psygnosis
I edited the article on historic video game developer Psygnosis about pronunciation. I mentioned that the correct pronunciation is voiced in the Psygnosis game 'Menace'.

Despite me naming a valid source you still removed my edit. Isn't that overzealous? Blocking perfectly valid information that enriches Wikipedia? I though you were supposed to moderate abuse and fake edits not legitimate facts backed up by identified sources!92.29.143.109 (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure you noticed, RickK75, but when you posted this message you were logged out. Second, simply providing a reference to how the video game is pronounced in 'Menace' is not the same as providing a reliable source. This principle of this issue is actually addressed in my talk page FAQ, when I state the following:
 * I reverted your edit due to concerns with verifiability. Readers only can verify the information they read if you provide an in-text citation using a template such as . You can read more about how to use those templates at Citing sources. If readers do not see a relevant in text citation, often they will distrust the information they read or remove it entirely.
 * In conclusion, you need to provide an in-text citation. Thanks, P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Boney M. Wikipedia English language
Your reaction on my rework/extra text in the article/wikipedia page Boney M. Has nothing to do with an attack....besides I am just started only a few weeks ago! Look to....YOU TUBE.... BONEY M. SONG OF JOY...version german tv Here Liz Mitchell receives a DIAMAND RECORD for reaching 150.000.000 pieces! So 80 million is not correct. I do not even know how/where to places riable sources. Maybe are you able to rework the sellings to the real pieces with mentioning the sources. Thanks! Musicworldvision (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The FAQ will answer your question. Note youtube is not a reliable source. Regarding finding reliable sources, just search google. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for information. Musicworldvision (talk) 23:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thanks :) much appreciated! P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your comment for the winter storm renaming
I moved your comment for the winter storm naming to be under the correct section. Option four, which is where your comment was, is simply to merge three of the articles and keep the one about the most significant storm. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 02:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Very sorry about that! Thank you for refactoring the comment. I must have thought I was only editing the first section. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Bob McDonald (Businessman) Edit Request
Thank you for recently approving the edit request I submitted for Bob McDonald.

Would it be possible for you to change one small item in the approved edit?

In the sentence that begins with "As COO, McDonald oversaw a $10 billion"...could you replace the title of COO with CEO? At the time of this event he was the CEO & Chairman of P&G.

If you need any additional information please contact me on my talk page and I'll be happy to assist.

Thank you.Tsmith47 (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I would prefer that you request changes, no matter how small, at the article talk page, so that other contributors can have a chance to also look them over. Thanks, P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * O.K. Thank you.Tsmith47 (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Duplication
Do you realize you are leaving duplicate notices on user talk pages (1 2, for example) ?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Indeed I did see that before you posted. Would you like me to revert? Honest mistake - first time using the RW MAT. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's up to you, just wanted to make sure you were aware something had gone awry.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Village pump (proposals)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Redesigning the featured, good, and article assessment icons. Pbrks (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)