User talk:P.K.Niyogi

Leave a message

Re: New Articles
Hi! Yes, it feels very nice and satisfying to start some new articles. I had not been able to do so in the recent past. Indeed, it felt great today :)

No, I have not been to Kullu Manali. I was trying to develop the article Himachal Pradesh. And found the scope to create several new articles from there. How are you? --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please help with your sources to develop Haraprasad Shastri.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the continuing help. Yes basing the article on one single major source (in this case, Banglapedia) is not adequate. That's particularly why I asked for your guidance, aided by your repertoir of sources.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh! What happened? Hope nothing serious. Please take care. And thanks a lot for bringing the article to a respectable look.--Dwaipayan (talk) 09:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Brahmo Samaj
Hi, I am back on Wikipedia, and also back to work after my course. I find that there has been some changes here. Many of the old regulars are missing. My attention was drawn to the number of Brahmo Samaj pages that have cropped up. I also find that you have retreated after some edit conflicts. What's the matter? And what about your health? Anything wrong? With best wishes. - Seejee (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Haraprasad Shastri
With regard to this sentence:
 * The Shastri title was conferred on those who secured a first class and he was the only student in his batch to do so.

I don't think I understand fully what this means, especially "secured a first class" and "only student in his batch to do so". Is "first class" some type of grade, and should batch be class?

« D. Trebbien ( talk ) 03:36 2008 April 14 (UTC)

শুভ নববর্ষ।




নতুন বছরে নতুন করে জীবনকে ভালবাসার মোড়কে জড়িয়ে ফেলার স্বপ্ন নাও এই সকালে। --Dwaipayan (talk) 05:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

 শুভ নববর্ষ।


 * শুভ নববর্ষ। আপনাকে জানাই নতুন বছরের সুভেচ্ছা। Amartyabag   TALK2ME  05:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * নতুন বছরের শুভেচ্ছা৷ আমার তরফ থেকেও৷ :-)--soum talk 05:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * আমিও জানালাম :D --Tarif from Bangladesh (talk) 08:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year
 ❤ শুভ নববর্ষ ❤

May the year be full of joy and happiness and lots of featured articles. May the year bring no pain or hardship or ArbComs. May the force and those Jedi Knights be always with you. Live long and prosper, longer and better than those pointy-eared Vulcan people. Aditya (talk • contribs)

শুভ নববর্ষ
 শুভ নববর্ষ এসো হে বৈশাখ এসো এসো.... বৈশাখের খরতাপে আর প্রখর সূর্যলোকে দূর হয়ে যাক সব গ্লানি। আজ এই দিন শুরু হোক নুতন করে, আজকের উচ্চারন হোক, ঐ নুতনের কেতন ওড়ে কাল-বৈশাখী ঝড়.... শুভ নববর্ষ। -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  20:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks to you too. -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  20:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Haliday Island Wildlife Sanctuary
Sorry. It is wrongly edited please.

--Dore chakravarty (talk) 06:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

J. F. Madan
Done. Thanks. Please let me know if you suggest any alternative fact. GDibyendu (talk) 06:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Updated as suggested. GDibyendu (talk) 08:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Motilal Seal
Dear Mr. Niyogi,

The photographs uploaded by me w.r.t. the article on 'Motilal Seal' are from family source. I hope this resolves your query. Regards, Cnmullick (talk) 19:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Mahendralal Sarkar
Dear Sir, now Dr Mahendralal Sarkar needs your inpot. Please help with your sources. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 10:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Motilal Seal
Changes are OK. Thanks & wishing you a speedy recovery from your health problems. Regards, Cnmullick (talk) 15:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Check mail
Have emailed you.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Kazi Nazrul Islam on FAR
Kazi Nazrul Islam has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Aditya (talk • contribs) 12:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hope you are ok and no more any health problems ...Take care --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 04:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * So, had a one month wiki-holiday? Good to see you back :) Please have a look at Pather Panchali, which is in peer review section of WikiProject Films now. Regards. --Dwaipayan (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Bengali wikipedia
Care to take a look at the Bangla wikipediatoo? We have very few editors from WB there, and definitely need more people to contribute. If you are Bengali peaople and speak,read and write in Bengali, please contribute bengali wikipedia also.Jayantanth (talk) 10:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for rely. If you are not interested in bengali wiki, ok. But if you found any problem to contribute in bengali wiki, i shall help you for that and our bengali wikipedians also help to you. Jayantanth (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Digboi
Few months back, someone has put a merge request between Digboi and Digboi Oil Town. It seems nobody commented on this suggestion. What do you think? GDibyendu (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks. GDibyendu (talk) 05:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Durga Puja photo
Namaskar Mukerjee,

we saw the beautiful photo of Durga Puja that you uploaded. Do you know how we can contact the original photographer? Thank you! Natha 02:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

bengali wikipedia
Care to take a look at the [Bangla wikipediatoo]? We have very few editors from WB there, and definitely need more people to contribute. If you are Bengali peaople and speak,read and write in Bengali, please contribute bengali wikipedia also.Jayantanth (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Coal mining in India
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Coal mining in India, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Category:Coal mining in India. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Please dont go
Niyogi, I saw you msg with plans to quit Wikipedia. I humbly request you to rethink your decision. Your contributions to Wikipedia and India related articles is beyond any words of praise. wish you all the luck .Take care --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 08:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I want to see u back with your wonderful articles. I wish u best of luck. Waitin to see u back. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  16:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Please don't leave Wikipedia. WP India needs YOU. A good wikibreak shall help you. Best of luck. --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 12:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Take it easy PK. Things will get better.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 05:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Do take a break and relax. It's not worth leaving due to some bad ass trolls. We'll help you battle the trolls in whatever way we can. For now, we have protected the page to dissuade vandals from returning. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  14:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Request Suggestions
I looked you up from Wikiproject India, in which I have enlisted myself. I have been spending some time bringing this article up to par and I have done a lot of work today. Would you take a look into the article and suggest the ways in which it can be expanded (I have a list of mathematical, medical, and engineering related innovations but am really lacking in the machines, astronomy, physics etc. fields) and made better? I want to bring it up to the level of this article and then work on the Science and technology in ancient India (rename it 'History of science and technology in India') article and then perhaps add a section like this one in the India article.

Thanks in advance,South Block (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Bridge to Terabithia (novel)
I saw your note asking for clarification about the controversial nature of this book. There is a section quite near the end of the article ("literary significance") that might answer your question. Joyous! | Talk 04:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Reigen
Thanks for your additions to La Ronde (play). Two comments:

1) Although I support all your editing, why was this marked "m"?

2) Over a year ago (on the discussion page) I suggested dealing with the strange name of this article (it should surely be changed to "Reigen"). Apart from your comment/edit there has been zero response, so what do you suggest? Testbed (talk) 16:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Jessica Lal and Ajit Jogi ;former CM of Chhattisgarh and close confidante of Late Shri Rajiv Gandhiji
Sir, I do not know who you are ,but please note that I have given a reference of all the Wikipedia pages as well as my blog on "organized crime and terrorism in India" ,whereby I have also posted documents and pictures ,authenticating all that I have written on Wikipedia,having first hand experience in person of the said events. Let me also apprise you of the fact that I have given an intervention in the Supreme Court of India,for the release of Mr.Manu Sharma who has been falsely implicated in the Jessica Lal murder. The presence of Mr.Manu Sharma on wikipedia is itself due to the Jessica Lal murder case. According to Indian Law a person is presumed to be innocent till his appeal rests with the Judiciary of India ,no matter at what level or hierarchy .It may be the junior courts or the apex court but the presumption rests with the judiciary that "let not an innocent be punished ;no matter you might release 8 wrong doers. So please let the public know the real facts.Not a single word I have written is without documentary evidence.The case pertains to the strategic interests and internal/external security of the country.Neither am I promoting a leader by the said changes nor should you unnecessarily use Wikipedia to besmirch and willify someone. Mamta Dhody Kalra 1513,Outram Lane Mukherjee Nagra, Dehli

Italic text
-9--Mamta dhody (talk) 15:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Jessica Lal Murder Case and Ajit Jogi ;former CM of Chhattisgarh and close confidante of Late Shri Rajiv Gandhiji
Sir, I do not know who you are ,but please note that I have given a reference of all the Wikipedia pages as well as my blog on "organized crime and terrorism in India" ,whereby I have also posted documents and pictures ,authenticating all that I have written on Wikipedia,having first hand experience in person of the said events. Let me also apprise you of the fact that I have given an intervention in the Supreme Court of India,for the release of Mr.Manu Sharma who has been falsely implicated in the Jessica Lal murder. The presence of Mr.Manu Sharma on wikipedia is itself due to the Jessica Lal murder case. According to Indian Law a person is presumed to be innocent till his appeal rests with the Judiciary of India ,no matter at what level or hierarchy .It may be the junior courts or the apex court but the presumption rests with the judiciary that "let not an innocent be punished ;no matter you might release 8 wrong doers. So please let the public know the real facts.Not a single word I have written is without documentary evidence.The case pertains to the strategic interests and internal/external security of the country.Neither am I promoting a leader by the said changes nor should you unnecessarily use Wikipedia to besmirch and willify someone. Mamta Dhody Kalra 1513,Outram Lane Mukherjee Nagra, Dehli

Italic text
-9--Mamta dhody (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Indian agriculture
I have just finished rewriting Indian agriculture. Make sure to read it whenever you find the time :-) JSR (talk) 13:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh!! thanks for bringing such a nice pic. Again thanks for your contribution to this site. we like it most.

tapan jana —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.143.41 (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Ayurveda
I have just finished rewriting Ayurveda using only the most reliable scholarship. Kindly take a look and let me know if you approve. It would also help if you could point out what more needs to be added to the article (except images of course, to which I get to soon). This edit was made using a draft I had prepared earlier and may not be perfect so please be sure to look and recommend.

Thanks in advance, JSR (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

It’s need to care Ayurveda article,Some people trying to say "Pseudo Science" /harmful medicine which is "medical politics ". Dr.SunBD (talk) 05:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

How to upload image?
Sir, ''I occasionally contribute to wiki article Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology. I have not been able to upload logo and images. Would you please guide me? The official website of the institute is www.mitmuzaffarpur.org and number of images are available in the photo gallery section.''User:Lallu Ram 06:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
Hullo! You've been a wonderful contributor. It would be great if you would be back- Ravichandar My coffee shop 12:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year
I hope you're doing fine. Happy New Year to you and your family. Regards --Tarif from Bangladesh (talk) 21:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nibaran Chandra Mukherjee
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nibaran Chandra Mukherjee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Unionsoap (talk) 13:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery1.jpg
File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery1.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery3.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Darjeeling Ghum Monastery3.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello from Sydney
Dear Mr.P.K.Niyogi,

Hope you are doing well. I need to contact you. Will you please give me your contact number? Alternately email me on info@syd-kol.org

Thanks in advance.

Regards, Neel Banerjee —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.225.2 (talk) 00:11, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Surul.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Surul.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --- Jayanta Nath (Talk 07:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

A request regarding the University of Calcutta article
Since you have edited the University of Calcutta article in the past, could you address the issue of why one of the editors is constantly reverting to the ad tag, repeatedly, without bothering to edit the article. See Talk:University of Calcutta for details.

Regards,

Patoldanga&#39;r Tenida (talk) 07:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Feni River
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Feni River, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/D_0015.HTM, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Feni River and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Feni River, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Feni River with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Feni River. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Feni River saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MLauba (Talk) 08:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Noting that sentences have been copy / pasted verbatim in other articles as well, like at Bangshi River. MLauba (Talk) 09:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * And Annette Akroyd. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Hindu Mela
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hindu Mela, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from at least http://books.google.com/books?id=IUcY_IRKDHQC&lpg=PA184&pg=PA184 and http://books.google.com/books?id=7GZuAAAAMAAJ&q=the+advent+of+the+'Young+Bengal'+brought+two+very+different+types+of+associations+to+the+fore&dq=the+advent+of+the+'Young+Bengal'+brought+two+very+different+types+of+associations+to+the+fore&hl=en&ei=zCSSTOqGBcKqlAem-ZmpCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hindu Mela and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Hindu Mela, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hindu Mela with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hindu Mela. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Hindu Mela saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Ranibandh
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ranibandh, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from at least http://bankura.org/site/Forest.htm (last line of article), repeat infringer so there is likely more, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ranibandh and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Ranibandh, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ranibandh with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ranibandh. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Ranibandh saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --VernoWhitney (talk) 14:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shikarpur, Shimoga


The article Shikarpur, Shimoga has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article is an exact duplicate of Shikaripura. Wonder how it has managed to stay since 2007.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why so serious? Talk to me 07:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Help from Sao Paulo_Brazil
Dear Mr P. K. Niyogi, I visited Kolkata last december 2010 and I took a photo of a statue in a Chowringhee Square and now I am trying to organize this material but I did not know the name of the personality that is statued there. I found a similar photo on Wikipeadia in "Esplanade_Kolkata" took by you. Please, help me to know the name of that mr. that seems to have been a scholar and a very mustache man. Tks a lot, From a luso-brazilian that like very much India, specially Calcutá Ademar F. de Araujo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.87.136.194 (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Umesh Chandra Dutta.jpg needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Umesh Chandra Dutta.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion,

or the own template..

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Spun Pipe.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spun Pipe.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 20:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kerala St Francis Church 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kerala St Francis Church 4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kendubillo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kendubillo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 23:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

& (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_requests&oldid=481419438#Message_to_take_part_in_Assessment_Drive request] on Bot requests. The Helpful  Bot  01:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your services
People may not often say this to you, but you have done your country a great service by contributing a treasure trove of information about it to the world. Thank you once again.

File:Vidysagar.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vidysagar.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 05:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pipariya Parivar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pipariya Parivar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pipariya Parivar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Noyster  (talk),  18:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Merging of two templates
Please participate in discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_31#August_31 Please ignore if already notified

File permission problem with File:Venice - Grand Canal.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Venice - Grand Canal.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Windermere Town.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Windermere Town.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Maidan3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maidan3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Mirik Lake.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mirik Lake.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Metiabruz
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Metiabruz &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Ejaz92 (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Ejaz92 (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Rome - Piazza di Spagna.JPG
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add  to the Media by uploader or Presumed self tag(s) if  present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log].

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Development hubs in West Bengal
Template:Development hubs in West Bengal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Manpower Chart.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manpower Chart.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Bargi
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Bargi article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Worldbruce (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Satyendranath Tagore
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Satyendranath Tagore article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Worldbruce (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem: John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from Acharya, Poromesh (1990). "Education in Old Calcutta". In Chaudhuri, Sukanta (ed.). Calcutta: The Living City. Volume I: The Past. Oxford University Press. pp. 86–87. ISBN 978-0-19-563696-3., and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Worldbruce (talk) 01:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Kolkata 1690.jpg


The file File:Kolkata 1690.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Pretty clearly a scan or photo of a book - there's water damage on the river! Own work claim therefore dubious at best."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jorasanko.JPG


The file File:Jorasanko.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Dubious own-work claim, serial copyright violator (and this image is orphaned anyway)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jog, Karnataka


A tag has been placed on Jog, Karnataka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"duplicate, vandalised, fake referenced article"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nimmoun (talk) 09:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)