User talk:P. Pearl-Lee C. Spears-Harris

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

December 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haygarden,_Rhode_Island. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove maintenance articles such as you did on this article without the issues being addressed. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Yawgoog, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yawgoog, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yawgoog, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 05:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Original research
I'm concerned that it seems much of what you're adding to these RI-related pages falls under the category of original research. For example, this addition: "However, only the South Kingstown resident who claims they live in West Kingston is correct. A Richmond resident who says they live in West Kingston is, even if not known to them, technically not speaking the truth. Just because a place falls under a certain zip code jurisdiction does not mean that place is located in the place name of the zip code." Where is this verifiable in reliable secondary sources? While I wouldn't say such an addition isn't helpful -- and I have no reason whatsoever to doubt its correctness -- rules/norms like "no original research" are what make it so people can't add this or that anecdote or ideas they just made up. Everything that appears anywhere in an article therefore has to also appear in reliable secondary sources. Those sources don't always have to be cited, but the sources do have to exist somewhere (so "Providence is the capital of Rhode Island" can be assumed verifiable, but what a Richmond resident means when he or she says something probably isn't).

Hope that makes sense. Ultimately it's probably a matter of trimming, rewording, and/or (ideally) citing a source. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  02:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KhnewKreator


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on KhnewKreator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  g s k  02:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kierieian, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kierieian, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kierieian, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Carpimaps (talk) 03:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bethel, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethel, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bethel, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Neufa, Connecticut for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neufa, Connecticut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Neufa, Connecticut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –dlthewave ☎ 16:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Haygarden, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haygarden, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Haygarden, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –dlthewave ☎ 16:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Burdickville, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burdickville, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Burdickville, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –dlthewave ☎ 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of South Hopkinton, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Hopkinton, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/South Hopkinton, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –dlthewave ☎ 16:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Canonchet, Rhode Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canonchet, Rhode Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canonchet, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –dlthewave ☎ 16:29, 7 May 2023 (UTC)