User talk:P1x77

Sorry to disagree Huon, but that's wrong. I didn't evade a previous block. Please, note that the block was elevated after I started a talk, not after I changed a page. When I saw that the motivation of the undoing of my last edit was "Unexplained removal of content", I created an account (I didn't have before) and started a talk about my motivations. P1x77 (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

This user's edit exactly matches the intention behind this one, performed by, known to be operating from the same IP address as. Note that I don't care one way or another as to the specific content on Chiavari. The only reason the content is there is that these sockpuppets were blocked right when the content had been reintroduced. I have no objection to an independent editor removing that content, but P1x77 clearly is not an independent editor. --Yamla (talk) 23:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Yamla yes, the intention is the same as and I read your talk about that with him, but I'm not the same person. Unfortunately it seems that, even if you agree that the content can be removed, every person trying to remove that wrong paragraph is considered a "socketpuppy". P1x77 (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * That IP you used to edit the article had gotten blocked before you used this account to edit the article's talk page, so yes, you did evade a prior block. Huon (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Huon, I just checked times and you are right; to say the truth I didn't realize that the IP was blocked before I created the account, but I understand that "technically" I evaded it. Thanks for your clarification. P1x77 (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC)