User talk:P40tomahawk

Speedy deletion of Mashup (digital)
A tag has been placed on Mashup (digital), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Was Canceled by Nominator
If you look at the history of your Mashup (digital) article, you will see that the person who nominated it for deletion undid the nomination. Mh29255 (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Mashup (digital) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mashup (digital) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mashup (digital) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RNealK (talk) 00:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)