User talk:PACPMR

Welcome!

Hello, PACPMR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SatuSuro 09:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Native Title
Nice work on the Native title on some of the Indigenous Australian communities, I've a few changes to stick to format, but keep up your efforts and thanks for helping out on the project.Hughesdarren (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Help
I'm having a few problems finding a source which indicates that: If the top option is correct then I'll rename the page to reflect the change. Would you be able to explain to me which of the above is true? (If you could reply here in on my talk page), Cheers Hughesdarren (talk) 02:53, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Bardi, Western Australia has been renamed to Ardyaloon (which was the feeling I got from your edits), or
 * Ardyaloon a community within Bardi

Hi, please see the below link that confirms Ardyaloon as the official name on the community plan - which recognises Bardi as an alternative name.

http://www.planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/CLP_Ardyaloon_CLP2_Amd_4_Report.pdf


 * Thanks for that, the name change (from Bardi to Ardyaloon) will be affected within the next day or two. If you are aare of any other community name changes please let me know on this talk page or mine and I'll look into it. Thanks again. Hughesdarren (talk) 12:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Do you plan on adding content?
Hello - I noticed that you created Junjuwa_community with only a picture/map of the location, and no content or references, and I am curious if you are going to be adding content to it, or else I may have to nominate it for deletion. Thanks. Touch Of Light (talk) 07:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Morrell Park community
Hey PACPMR, I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Morrell Park community-- The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information.It would be great if you could also improve the related article Kabi.

It's nice to see you editing! Amy Z (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Request for an Interview
Hi PACPMR,

I recently sent you a message about Morrell Park community.

I am a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University examining how to make interaction in Wikipedia more effective. Our research has shown that certain types of feedback encourage Wikipedians to edit more while others seem to discourage them. Experienced and less experienced Wikipedians seem to have different reactions to very similar feedback. I am interested in interviewing you about your reaction to the message I sent you. A discussion with you will help us better understand the types of feedback that can encourage newcomers's participation to Wikipedia without turning off old-timers.

I can talk with you via online chat, on Skype, over the phone, or just through Wikipedia messages if you are more comfortable with that. The interview should take take less than 60 minutes. You do need to be over 18 years old, and consent to be a part of the study in order to for me to interview you. This study has been approved by Carnegie Mellon's research ethics committee (the IRB), and the Wikipedia Research Committee.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. We will be glad to send you a draft describing our research results right after the interview.

Amy Z (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Avoiding copyright problems
Hello, and welcome. Your addition to Bidyadanga Community, Western Australia has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2012 (UTC)