User talk:PAELIN

Problems with upload of File:ACFUN-beta.png
Thanks for uploading File:ACFUN-beta.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing bilibili from the 'see also' section of the Acfun article. 请停止将B站链从Acfun文章中移除.
The reasons are simple:

1 Bilibili is a site that's extremely similar to Acfun, and is considered by some as EVEN SUPERIOR to nicovideo or Acfun, so I don't see any need to remove this other than ACers being jealous or showing prejudice towards a superior site

2 The bilibili article itself has Acfun in its see also section.

Thanks for your cooperation. W7n (talk) 05:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

More on this:

As described in Manual_of_Style/Layout, whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. When common sense is involved, bilibili (and also nicovideo) is quite obviously related to acfun, as acfun and bilibili are often compared and also referred to as a single term (AB站) as two of the leading ACG related, floating comments implemented video sites.

And besides, if your reason for deleting bilibili in the acfun article is valid, the same could apply to the bilibili article which has acfun in its see also section. Or should I put it in this way: If you're going to show that you are trying to stick to your own standards (instead of making a futile effort to draw people's attention away from bilibili), next time remove the acfun link in the bilibili article too. W7n (talk) 08:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Acfun-New-logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Acfun-New-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)