User talk:PAGETURNER22/sandbox

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Keronic Grant

Date of review: 5/1/13

Name of editor: Paige Wiliams

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PAGETURNER22/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: -

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): good length

Image (needed/appropriate): needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed:

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych):

Wikiformatting: numbered

Grammar & composition: Grammar ok

Other comments: add image

--Keronica Grant (talk) 04:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/1/13

Name of editor: Paige Wiliams PAGETURNER22

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PAGETURNER22/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: -

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Perfect edit length

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: Simple formatting, numbered

Grammar & composition: Correct grammar

Other comments: Check your citing!

--Christina geo (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer: Aaleksanian Date of review:04/17/13 Name of Editor: Pageturner22 URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PAGETURNER22 Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/17/13 Date review submitted to instructor: 04/17/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Meets the requirement

Image (needed/appropriate): not needed Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate to textbook information Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A Wikiformatting: Good Grammar & composition: Good Other comments:	 Well written, some bullet points could be added for more credit. Aaleksanian (talk) 14:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

(Aisha Hamid (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC))

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User:MsPsychology

Date of review	4/25/2013

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User: Pageturner22

URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PAGETURNER22

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	4/25/13

Date review submitted to instructor	4/25/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)	Length of edit is accurate.

Image (needed/appropriate)	No image is added, none needed.

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Information is accurate, from textbook.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	N/A

Wikiformatting	Formatting is good.

Grammar & composition	Grammar and composition is accurate,there are no errors.

Other comments	Good job! (User:MsPsychology (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2013 (UTC))