User talk:PCHS-NJROTC/Archive 5

Global cooling?
I was wondering if you could supply a source for this addition? Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 04:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I was just about to look for a source, but it looks like someone else already took care of it. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 21:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Pawl TV listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pawl TV. Since you had some involvement with the Pawl TV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SharedIPCORP
Template:SharedIPCORP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 04:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Your rollback of Risperidone...
I undid your rollback of Risperidone by 204.83.171.145 because in fact Risperidone is used to treat hiccups. Not entirely sure if it was a test edit which happened to be a "lucky guess" or whether they knew what they were doing- in either case it has been reverted and a cite added to the article. Thanks, VictorianMutant (talk) 11:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry about that. It just looked like another silly vandalism edit when I was RC patroling. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 20:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, sometimes it's hard to tell the difference...VictorianMutant (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Shared IP
Cheers, PCHS. Thanks for the barnstar! Of course, barely a week after they're done, there's talk of changing the whole series of icons. See Template talk:Shared IP edu. I'm always open to something better, so we'll see what Pretzels comes up with. Nice to see you back. --Bsherr (talk) 21:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm on and off here these days. I rolled back SharedIPCORP because of lack of consensus to match it identical to SharedIP, but I do believe it could use a little work. I know you're not going to like that, but there was really no consensus to get rid of it. I also put in a editprotected over at Template talk:ISP to use Shared IP.svg instead of the information icon. Keep up the good work! ;) PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 21:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oy, you're killing me with that SharedIPCORP. It still said "registered to a business" and has the separate category. The language is exactly the same as Shared IP. What's the purpose of keeping them separate?
 * I also just finished Template:SharedIPPublic/Sandbox.
 * --Bsherr (talk) 22:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The same is true with most of the shared templates. Nice work with SharedIPPublic. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 16:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You know, that's not so concerning the differences between the templates. Gov includes the SIP notice, Edu includes instruction to use schoolblock, Public includes instruction to use anonblock. Only Corp is exactly the same. I didn't want to bring up the other templates in the TfD, but that's one of the reasons Corp is unneeded. --Bsherr (talk) 21:31, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * CORP should have the SIP notice as well; WP:SIP states that blocks on major corporations like Microsoft and Sun should be brought to the attention of the communications committee. The instructions to use anonblock at Template:SharedIPPublic is indifferent from the instructions at Template:SharedIP if you look closely. Don't you think at least major corporations should have a special template with special instructions? By the way, this is your third revert; may I suggest an RFC or third opinion to settle this matter? PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 22:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Pardon, I mean the instructions about the duration of the block, that the user may be limited to a time interval, at Public, contrasted to Shared IP.
 * The edit at Corp wasn't intended to be a revert—rather, I deleted the categorization to the deleted category. Since part of your argument was that the purpose of the separate template was preserving the categorization, I thought perhaps the deletion of the category was a change in circumstances. I wouldn't consider it edit warring for you to restore the old design minus the categorization.
 * SIP would be a difference, but SharedIPCORP is used on all businesses, not just the comparatively few famous corporations contemplated by SIP. And SIP merely suggests, it does not require, notification for famous corporations. I think, given this, a SIP notice is unhelpful. If desirable at all, a wholly separate SIP template could be used on shared and unshared famous corporation IP addresses.
 * I've also posted a reply on my talk page to your inquiry there.
 * Regards. --Bsherr (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not a bad idea, but I would like to keep it in the form of a shared template. It probably wouldn't be very newsworthy if one non-shared IP had to be blocked unless it traced back to Bill Gates's or Steve Jobs's workstation. I'll play in Template:SharedIPCORP/sandbox and see what you think. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 00:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I follow, but I don't think presently that "it may be a good idea to notify the committee" is strong enough to warrant the SIP notice, particularly when implementing it with the Shared IP template would apply it to a majority of talk pages of IPs to which it would not apply. I'd rather hear from ComCom whether this is desirable from their perspective. --Bsherr (talk) 04:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's actually an excellent idea. We should ask the opinion of the ComCom members regarding using notices in SharedIP, SharedIPCORP, and/or SharedIPGOV. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

WP:Hospitals
If you are interested in contributing more to articles about hospitals you may want to join WikiProject Hospitals (signup here). Ng.j (talk) 20:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up! PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 03:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Neon
I was trying to fix vandalism, not make it. It now says "[hi:Neon]]", so I;m going to change it back. 66.183.24.183 (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the mix up. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 02:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

To whom it may concern
Recently you edited the page for Murder of Denise Amber Lee asking for a citation about her using a prepaid cell phone. Here is one of many http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/feb/20/wp-prepaid-phones-hit-and-miss-when-using-911/

Denise was my daughter-in-law. I attended Michael King's murder trial and being Nathan's mother, I am QUITE familiar with the case. I do not know how to use WIKI otherwise I would be glad to fix this problem. I only wish I knew, recently in the state of Florida they passed a law making it mandatory for all 911 call takers to receive training. Governor Crist signed it into law last summer. It is important for people to realize not all phones and not all states have E911. They should! Some areas in Missouri (for example) do not have 911 at all. If you have questions, please, contact our foundation. MarkLee@DeniseAmberLee.org

We appreciate your interest in Denise's case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.7.242 (talk) 15:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Prepaid phones should, in my opinion, give the same E-911 information as contract phones, but that doesn't mean it's so. It is policy to require citations for information included in articles, hence why I added a "citation needed" note. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Morgan (attorney)


A tag has been placed on John Morgan (attorney), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Baseball  Watcher  01:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I must respectfully disagree; I don't see how the article is any more promotional than the Michele Obama article, for example. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Hey!
Hey, long time no see, dude! How's it going there? Oh, and thanks for the edits to teh Grand Theft Jimbo page, haven't really paid attention to it, as I had a lot of things to do, both on and off-wiki. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * As for the expansions, yeah, it is 'swell. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * They already managed to hack new maps in place of the old one, but they're yet to fully reverse-engineer the characters and game logic. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and btw, do you have an MSN, Yahoo or any other instant messaging IDs? I feel like talking to you better there than on WP. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree; WP is an encyclopedia project, not Facebook. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 03:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi there. Y'know, I can't really forbid you from doing it or anything, but I just removed that link to your FaceBook account in the interests of your own privacy. Feel free to reinstate it, of course, but it might be an idea to not publicize personal information like that. Just trying to help ... - A l is o n  ❤ 19:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Alison! Facebooks are out there in the open anyway; I post nothing on there that I wouldn't want to end up on Fox News and CNN. Anybody can find them. As for privacy settings, they're a joke. A lot of people in the wiki-world know who I am anyway, and it doesn't bother me really, so long as they're not posting my address, phone number, social security number, etc. But thanks for watching out. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 20:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

User talk:107.10.153.205
Out of interest, when you welcomed this IP with particular thanks for his/her edits to Telemarketing, which of the two pieces of vandalism did you think merited the most appreciation? BencherliteTalk 22:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It was an assumption of good faith. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 22:19, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That didn't post the way I meant it to post; I'll be more careful next time. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 22:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, it wasn't a fair criticism on reflection. The IP's on holiday now, anyway... BencherliteTalk 22:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Otto J. Zahn
Hello. When you deleted the Conservapedia reference in the above article, you left its pithy quote behind, so I deleted the quote also and added info from the WP article to make up for its lack. Thanks for paying attention to this piece. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Virtual Times 2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Times 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

WP:AN thread
HI PCHS-NJROTC,

Two things. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I tweaked the section title, hope you don't mind.
 * 2) You refer to two of Materialscientist's blocks. You need to notify them of the thread, so they can comment.
 * Thanks. I notified Materialscientist, as well as another administrator who blocked an IP I referenced. As for the word insane, I meant insanely long, not that it was insane to block the IPs. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Your name
Hi there: This isn't a complaint, just an observation: every time I see your name in its big red letters, I read it as "Psycho-Neurotic". Clearly, that's not what it says, but. . . Bielle (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Am I really that transparent? Just kidding, of course. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 06:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, no problem, congrats on passing! PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 18:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Creative Nation
I apologize for mis-stating or mis-representing the intentions of this wiki entry. The creation of the Creative Nation wiki page is in no way an attempt to advertise or promote the company. Creative Nation is not a company that is selling a product, nor is it a company promoting a service. Rather, it is a private, US music publishing company, that represents a group of distinguished songwriters and musicians, and does not accept unsolicited requests. With the recent announcement of a partnership with Universal Music Publishing Group a separate wiki entry seems necessary. I ask that any proposal to delete this entry be re-considered, and I'm happy to improve the page further, if that would make a difference. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this statement (Jpoindex (talk) 18:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpoindex (talk • contribs) 18:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the message
Thank you for the message. P.S. I salute you for fighting as a soldier 99.229.41.79 (talk) 01:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome! By the way, I'm not active military or anything, I just took a class in high school. I did plan on going into the service, but plans change. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

129.94.130.221
...is rangeblocked, as are all addresses starting with 129.94.130.*. Don't bother warning, just revert.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't realize they were rangeblocked, but someone needs to revoke their talkpage rights though; if someone from that shared IP wants to edit, they need to request an account. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 00:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SW Florida Regional Medical Center.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SW Florida Regional Medical Center.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Chick pic

 * Thanks!. And by the way, I waited in that 45 minute line! PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 12:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Minor edit
Hi there. I saw you recently reverted the Andrew McCutchen article to the last good version (last good version attributed to myself, incidentally). While it's good you reverted the user's edit and did not bite the user, I would encourage you to avoid using the 'minor edit' button for reverts or instances where you have detected vandalism. Some admins/editors have settings in place to ignore minor edits but reverts or vandalism is something you'd definitely want to make sure was brought to their attention. Cheers! Zepppep (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I usually use either rollback or Twinkle when reverting vandalism, and those tools are responsible for marking the edits as minor, so you'll have to take up the issue with the developers responsible for those tools. In this case, I used rollback to revert the vandalism at Andrew McCutchen and Twinkle to leave a warning message at User talk:173.21.99.19. Thanks for stopping by! PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Being as I don't use either of those two tools, I would encourage you to bring the issue up with the developers. Perhaps there's a different setting that could be applied or there is a section regarding it in a FAQ section. Admins will like being notified of any article reverts (it can bring their attention to an article that is suffering from edit warring or dealing with vandals. Zepppep (talk) 01:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not an issue with Twinkle or Rollback, they are working as intended per Help:Minor edit. According to that page, reverting vandalism is specifically mentioned under "When to mark an edit as a minor edit".  There was also a discussion on the talk page about this.  Short of a new consensus changing how that page is worded, marking as minor the reversion of vandalism is preferred, because it is a minor edit in that it requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. - SudoGhost 02:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)\
 * OK, I digress. I am aware of what is a minor edit. Zepppep (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It was not noted as vandalism in the edit summary. Perhaps including that in the edit summary would suffice. Zepppep (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm split on this, because while I know that reversion of vandalism has always been considered a minor edit, vandalism is not all uniform. Really, really blatant vandalism like additions of text like "jane doe is a fat lesbian" is indisputably abusive, some things that look like vandalism to an RC patrol might be good-faith contributions, like removing of large chunks of text. I usually try to use Twinkle and include an edit summary for reversions of such contributions, but there's others that don't. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 02:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Toddst1 (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Lulz.
Thanks for messaging me on Mod The Sims, dude. Haven't been mucking around with The Sims 3 lately, but I might come up with some mods when I have time. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Your're welcome. You're a step ahead of me then because I don't even have TS3 or all of the expansion packs for TS2; I only have TS1 (with all expansions) and TS2 Uni and NL. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 15:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
A. B. (talk • contribs) 05:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

That IP you just left a message
That was what, five seconds? Impressive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.202.55 (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm what they call a Recent Changes patrol, meaning I analyze real time edits and revert the malicious ones. In your case, I noticed you were making editing tests in the main space, so I thought I'd leave a kind message pointing you to the sandbox. Thanks for editing Wikipedia! PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 16:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah. Thanks, and feel free to delete this category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.202.55 (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Nah, I like to keep my old messages, at least in an archive. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 16:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Banning
Please state reason for blocking my ip based upon vandalism? 64.128.27.82 (talk) 19:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No one said anything about banning your IP... yet. That's just the standard shared IP template, showing that the IP appears to be used by multiple users in a corporate environment. Now if people from that IP go on a vandalism spree, it very well could get blocked, which is why it's always a good idea to create an account when editing from such IPs. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 19:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've looked at the history, and I am the only person contributing to Wikipedia within several years. 64.128.27.82 (talk) 19:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, sometimes it's hard to tell with corporate proxies. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 19:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Food days
Hiya. Thanks for helping with the List of food days. I split out the weeks and months sections, so some of your contributions are now in List of food weeks and List of food months. Any thoughts on the list names? I was pondering changing to 'List of commemorative food days', etc. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI)  22:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Paul Bragg
Deleted your spam under the Paul Bragg article's talk area. GTFO. :) Thanks --76.105.145.143 (talk) 05:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I don't even remember posting that. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 14:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Credit card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)