User talk:PGRE89

Welcome!
Hello, PGRE89, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Bon courage (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey, I am doctor, I have not conflict of interest, just science, I am updating the current state of the art citing high level academic research, do not be biased and offensive please.
 * All the best PGRE89 (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please refer to WP:MEDRS, wikipedia relies on secondary sources for biomedical content, not primary research. Also be aware of WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. Thanks! Bon courage (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bon courage (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Bon courage, you are quite biased and malicious blocking relevant and objective science to be decently acknowledged accordingly to wikipedia scopes and aims. You are the only one who disagree with this content while other editors accepted and implemented it. I am sure if we were face to face you would not behave in this poor way... PGRE89 (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You did not read or understand WP:MEDRS it seems, but instead have launched a personal attack. ALL editors need to follow the relevant sourcing standards, and self-citation (if that's what is happening) is a compounding issue. If you continue edit warring you are likely to be blocked. If you want to raise a general query about these sources, post at WT:MED or at the relevant article(s) Talk pages, so other editors can comment. Bon courage (talk) 20:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Bon Courage, the study I have mentioned is perfectly in line with the WP:MEDRS "policy your weakly arguing.. The study I have mentioned is the largest study ever carried out in humans on tyrosine intake and lasted for over 3 years and it is published in the top 10 springer nature journal of medicine and nutrition. It looks like you have not read anything or you have some sort very very heavy bias against knowledge and science. The way you are censoring me in a fascist way for no objective reason and for whatsoever personal bias.
 * I am reporting this in the talk page and to wikipedia PGRE89 (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no excuse for your "fascist" response above. You are free to disagree or dispute other editors' edits or comments, but that's over the line. I am open to unblocking you,provided you acknowledge this, and provided you pledge to keep discussion about the merits of your edits and sources and how they might be appropriate for inclusion.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Acroterion, I see how naming his/her behaviour as fascist censorship can result over the line, but I had no better elements to describe such level of biases, ignorance and twisted understanding of high-level academic research. If you spent a few minutes reading what @Bon courage wrote, you will notice the poor and biased level of his/her thinking (and also that I am not the only one condamming his/her unethical behaviour).
 * for sure I am open and eager to comply with more appropriate wording, but I have to be assured that individuals like @bon courage must comply with wikipedia aims and scope and not being biased as well as capable and competent in treating and understanding science. PGRE89 (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * For a start, you need to stop attacking other editors who disagree with you, even if you are avoiding invoking Godwin's law now. You are free to disagree, but you need to be able to discuss disagreements without personalizing them, addressing the substance of someone's objections rather than the person. "Fascist" has become a cheapened throwaway line for "person I don't agree with," but it's not tolerated here.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, I got that @Acroterion PGRE89 (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Sock-puppet investigation
Please see Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Welcome
 Welcome to Wikipedia, PGRE89! 

ANI
Please note you are the subject of a discussion at WP:ANI. Thanks. Bon courage (talk) 03:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)