User talk:PHILPSJOE

June 2016
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Software development has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Delerium1


A tag has been placed on User:Delerium1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 12:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gar103


A tag has been placed on User:Gar103, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jay Garfield
Hello PHILPSJOE,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jay Garfield for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JohannSnow (talk) 10:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your Smartphone Can Cause Some Real Unhappiness
We’ve already given most of our privacy away to smartphones and Facebook. They know where we are, who our friends are, what we like to buy and much more about our personality than we’d like to admit. But according to a new study, they may also have access to your bank account. The authors say that if you combine data from embedded sensors in wearable technologies, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers, with a PIN cracking algorithm you have an 80% chance of identifying a PIN code from the first try and an over 90% chance of cracking it in 3 tries. Yan Wang, assistant professor of computer science at the Thomas J. Watson School of Engineering and Applied Science at Binghamton University is working on smartphone security and privacy. He said that wearable devices in particular pose a significant risk and can be exploited with relative ease. He and his colleagues conducted 5,000 key-entry tests on three key-based security systems, including an ATM, with 20 adults wearing a variety of technologies over 11 months. Basically, regardless of the hand position and regardless of how much you try to conceal your hand movement, the accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers inside the wearable technologies can still figure out what PIN you are typing in. In other words, your smartwatch is detecting your hand movement and figuring out your PIN. According to the team, this is the first study to test this – at least the first scientific study. The required technology is still quite sophisticated, but with the right tools available, it’s worryingly easy to crack PIN codes. There are two attacking scenarios that are achievable: internal and sniffing attacks. In an internal attack, attackers access embedded sensors in wrist-worn wearable devices through malware. The malware waits until the victim accesses a key-based security system and sends sensor data back. Then the attacker can aggregate the sensor data to determine the victim’s PIN. An attacker can also place a wireless sniffer close to a key-based security system to eavesdrop sensor data from wearable devices sent via Bluetooth to the victim’s associated smartphones. The findings are just an early step in understanding the vulnerabilities and at the moment, there is no evident solution to fix these risks. The authors do suggest that developers “inject a certain type of noise to data so it cannot be used to derive fine-grained hand movements, while still being effective for fitness tracking purposes such as activity recognition or step counts.”

Source: Happy_ho

Is Your Child A Thumb Sucker Or Bites Nails? Rejoice Their Good Health
Are you worried That your toddler sucks their thumb or bite their nails? Here is a reason to not to get worried and be happy. Children who bite their nails or suck their thumbs are less likely to develop allergic sensitivities, a new study suggests. And, if they have both ‘bad habits’, they are even less likely to be allergic to such things as house dust mites, grass, cats, dogs, horses or airborne fungi, researchers said. “Our findings are consistent with the hygiene theory that early exposure to dirt or germs reduces the risk of developing allergies,” said Malcolm Sears, formerly from Dunedin School of Medicine in New Zealand and currently with McMaster_University in Canada. “While we do not recommend that these habits should be encouraged, there does appear to be a positive side to these habits,” said Sears. Researchers were testing the idea that the common childhood habits of thumb-sucking and nail-biting would increase microbial exposures, affecting the immune system and reducing the development of allergic reactions also known as atopic sensitisation. The habits of thumb-sucking and nail-biting were measured in a longitudinal birth cohort of more than 1,000 New Zealand children at ages 5, 7, 9 and 11; and atopic sensitisation was measured by skin-prick testing at 13 and 32 years old. Researchers found 31 per cent of children were frequent thumb suckers or nail biters. Among all children at 13 years old, 45 per cent showed atopic sensitisation, but among those with one oral habit, only 40 per cent had allergies, researchers said. Among those with both habits, only 31 per cent had allergies. This trend was sustained into adulthood, and showed no difference depending on smoking in the household, ownership of cats or dogs; or exposure to house dust mites, they said.

Speedy deletion nomination of Happyho


A tag has been placed on Happyho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 11:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Happy ho


A tag has been placed on Happy ho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cahk (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)