User talk:PHVoter

March 2010
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Please be aware: this has nothing to do with my opinions (if any) about Fasano; this has to do with our rules about impartiality and reliable sources. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] This is not commentary. It is the facts which are supported by both the Pinellas County Unincorporated Area budget and local newspaper articles all of which are documented on PalmHarborVoters.com a group of non-partisan voters. Senator Fasano is one of the most powerful men in the Florida Senate, we the voters of unincorporated Palm Harbor have no legal rights or protections, much less a voice. If tyranny is occurring by denying people one of their most cherished constitutional rights (the right to vote), it should be exposed not censured. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PHVoter (talk • contribs) — PHVoter (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * That group may be technically non-partisan, but it's clearly not a neutral or reliable source. Your persistent efforts to advertise that website put you at risk of being blocked as a "role account" for the group. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mike Fasano (politician). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. AniMate 21:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Advice
I'm going to echo some of what Orange Mike said. You need to read our policies on presenting information from a neutral point of view and what constitutes a reliable source. Perhaps the issues you are raising have appeared in local newspapers. If so, it's likely Fasano has commented on the allegations. Presenting both sides with a source would be acceptable. Linking to a voters advocacy group with a definite opinion is not acceptable however. AniMate 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)