User talk:PJR7

February 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to White Rose (disinformation group). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The person who wrote the original article just added their own point of view throwing juvenile slurs and unfounded accusations. My commentary is more accurate PJR7 (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The various people who wrote the article will have used press sources, the same sources that you tried to change the headlines of in your edit. If you're here to put the record straight and tell the truths that can't be found in any books or mainstream media, I'm afraid Wikipedia doesn't work like that: see WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. --Lord Belbury (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Using terms like "conspiracy theorists" and "anti vaxxers" shows the level of the writer, It's very low intellect

The sources are from mainstream media who always publish sensationalist articles. 12 year olds are smarter than the publishers of this article because even though they are juvenile, they wouldn't use juvenile language to push their confirmation bias. PJR7 (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2022 (UTC)