User talk:PJTraill

A Welcome From EinsteinMC2
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your recent contributions and future influence on Wikipedia. I hope you find pleasure and enjoyment from other Wikipedians. We are glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for you and others to educate yourself more on what being a Wikipedian really means:


 * If you have not already, drop by the New User Log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How To Edit A Page
 * Editing, Policy, Conduct, and Structure Tutorial
 * Picture Tutorial
 * How To Write A Great Article
 * Naming Conventions
 * Manual Of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you are ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there is also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is What Wikipedia Is Not. If you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to see the Help Pages or add a question to the Village Pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Have a wonderful experience!

Feel free to ask me or other Wikipedians questions any time. If you have any issues that you cannot resolve, contact me at Talk Page.

Greeting From EinsteinMC2

Talk pages
As far as this one goes, I wouldn't worry about it now as it's done. In general, I'm suggesting that any Talk thread should be left on the page where it was started and not moved even if it seems more topical on another page. If you want to alert a particular group of editors to a discussion elsewhere leave them a note. Talk discussions should not be deleted at all, unless they are personal attacks.

When the time comes to archive the page generally check: How to archive a talk page. Anyone is free to do this; it's considered quite helpful actually, as waiting a minute for a Talk page to load is annoying. The only thing you shouldn't archive is a thread that still appears active. Marskell 16:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Prince's Club

 * If I remember correctly, there have been a few "Prince's Court"s. The current one in McLean, Virginia is relatively new.  If I get a chance in a couple days I will try to find more info about the others -- any written material I have is not handy right now. &mdash;  Eoghanacht  talk 16:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

I have a couple of xerox pages that I think came from Noel, Evan Baillie and J. O. M. Clark. A History of Tennis, p. 129, Oxford University Press, 1924 (ISBN 071562380X), pp. 562-565. I do not have access to the rest of the book. The pages contain a chart of tennis court dimensions. There are three that contain the name "Prince's" with what little narrative description on the pages:
 * Prince's Club, built 1890
 * Prince's Club, Brighton, converted from a riding school in 1836
 * Old Prince's, dismantled 1887

Sorry but this is all the information I have. Prince's Court at the International Tennis Club of Washington is apparently named after Frederick H. Prince, the main financial contributor to the club's founding. &mdash; Eoghanacht  talk 17:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

PJTraill 16:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC) See User talk:Eoghanacht

Tennis club names
Do you have any objection to moving Merton Street tennis court to Oxford University Real Tennis Club?

I already compiled a list of active clubs at real tennis organizations. I think I have them all down correctly, but if any of the names there is wrong, please fix it. If you are interested in starting articles for the many "red links" there, please do so -- it would be quite helpful. &mdash; Eoghanacht  talk 20:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Euthanasia
Hi PJTraill. I'm afraid I've just reversed your edits to the talk page of the Euthanasia article. I'm sure you made them with the best of intentions and I'm sure you put a considerable amount of work into it; it pains me to throw that away. However, the reorg misrepresented the argument, and seemed to delete a lot of ROHA's material at the same time. Talk pages are never works of beauty, and often hard to follow. However, any editing of other people's additions to such pages needs to be approached with great care. &#0151; JEREMY 08:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * PJTraill 18:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not feel bad about reverting my edit to Talk:Euthanasia. While I feel sure that I managed to preserve the entire discussion while separating it into 2 (or 3) threads, I see that the  is pretty unilluminating. Maybe it is still possible to create a new thread to discuss the Youthanasia link, and put in there a summary of what was said under the picture-thread, but I don't feel up to it just now. The point is that in among the bile and snide remarks there were one or two useful remarks emerging.
 * I wish there were a sort of WTPML or CDML, a Wikipedia Talk Page or Controversial Discussion Markup Language, enabling one to conduct open discussions with some participants being awkward and yet retaining a clear and scarcely redundant structure. You would just see an assertion, plus annotations for here are disagreements/refutations/clarification/supporting arguments/comments, which could be opened up to reveal more assertions and possible annotations. Rewording (by the author) has to be possible, so each assertion has to be versioned, so annotations refer to some version of the assertion .. and what if an author pretends to reword while actually changing the subject .. it is not straightforward! But it would be wonderful to transform some of the loathsome rambles on the internet (Talk:Euthanasia was not even that bad) into usefully structured arguments.
 * Thanks for your good will. I do like the idea of some kind of automated talk page untangling system, or a way to record talk page discussions such that tangling is automagically prevented or tracked. (I'd even be prepared to contribute to a discussion of such a system, if you wanted to start one.) Until we have such a system in place though, I think we'll just have to put up with the current imperfect mechanisms and their inherent limitations. &#0151; JEREMY 06:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Signing talkpage posts
I've responded on Talk:Ten Commandments. Please note that talk page entries are signed at the end of comments, not at the beginning. It is also generally not adviced to insert interjections into other people's comments unless offensive material has been removed as per WP:RPA. JFW | T@lk  23:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

New Real Tennis Wikia
Wikipedia seems to be cracking down somewhat on articles that are not suitable for an encyclopaedia. For instance the Royal Melbourne Tennis Club article is marked for deletion. I've created a [Real Tennis Wikia] designed to be the font of all knowledge about real tennis. This is a good place to put information which may be not significant enough for Wikipedia's policies, not fully cited, and so forth. I wonder if you'd be able to give me a hand copying the information already on Wikipedia over there (lest it get deleted) and filling out more pages? You can catch me at: User_talk:JeremyHoward

Blank line
Hi there, thanks for your question about the blank line. There's actually an inbuilt blank before and after a section heading even if you don't put it there in the edit box. It's not about saving space, rather It's a wiki style thing not to increase the size of the blank because it breaks up the space more than necessary for the eye to follow when quickly reading and the page doesn't look "tight" and looks incomplete. I was under the impression that many editors routinely zap the outsize space for textual (and eye scan) "flow" reasons. (Similarly with lists in wikipedia and over use of c quotes – those big blue ones – in an article.) Get back to me if you find this is not the case. I'd be very interested. Julia Rossi (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry to have burbled on – the words I was looking for are consistency in layout. : )


 * (copied from JR talk page) PJT, have a look at the version of the article prior to JR's line deletion, here. You'll see that the space above the section heading Carbon footprint of Christmas is greater than is the case for other section headings. JR was merely bringing the format back into line with the wikipedia manual of style. I note, in passing, PJT, that the URL you pasted was https://secure.wikimedia.org/ ... I'm a little intrigued as to the reason for using the secure site rather than the normal site. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Answers: User_talk:Julia_Rossi and User_talk:Tagishsimon. PJTraill (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, thank you for explaining PJT – you're a programmer which suggests you have more considerations other than that of just editing (as me), so I think I get it now. Afaik the server space isn't what's emphasised to vol editors, but symmetry and stylistic consistency - in keeping with a printed text rather than a trailing thread style. My guess is there are many tweaks that take up server space but are not discouraged (whatever they may be) and space is seen as (virtually) unlimited as in not a priority. Which is why I had a wha...?? reaction. I like your poetry vs programming view though I see editorial style as function rather than poetics. Not being a programmer, could you explain the source/article difference? Are you actually operating a mirror wikipedia? I'm interested since this is the first time anyone's raised the issue. Thanks, Julia Rossi (talk) 21:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Poetics of space
Hi again, I just discovered your user page, and want to add that at one point I was interested in writing about space v structure and one of the theorists I attempted to critique wrote a book called Poetics of Space, which somehow suits you. : ) Regards, Julia Rossi (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Secure server
Seems like a good reason! I wasn't aware of that bit of advice. Now I am :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

--XgenX (talk) 06:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Infinitism
I agree with waht you said. They did the same thing with sizing things with coins. I really think they are sensoring peoples ideas. did it start with hate speech? how do they draw the line? but the coin sizing sucked. they want to to size things with rulers marked with centimeters. did you know that metrics (sic) was the dimensional measurement that did not involve the size of the human body? they are not just trying to remove the american, or the human, but the life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by XgenX (XgenX (talk) 06:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)|talk]] • contribs) 05:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I would like to know more about infinitism(religion) here. Can you put it in the discussion on the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by XgenX (talk • XgenX (talk) 06:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)|contribs]]) 06:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC) XgenX (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)--XgenX (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I am sorry to say that I do not follow what you are saying. If you want to know more about infinitism, you will have to search for it. I was not so much interested in the religion as wanting to avoid clutter on the philosophy topic. If you want to participate in Wikipedia, I suggest you register and stay registered. PJTraill (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello PJTraill! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Carel S. Scholten -

Speedy deletion nomination of CPT (file format)


A tag has been placed on CPT (file format) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fleet Command (talk) 09:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Beam splitter
 * added a link pointing to Quantum theory


 * EPR paradox
 * added a link pointing to Hidden variables

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GIWS


A tag has been placed on GIWS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pam D  23:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * None of the entries on the page were valid dab page entries: a redlinked entry on a dab page must always include a blue link to an article where the subject is discussed. Also a dab page entry for an abbreviation for an organisation etc is only valid if the abbreviation is shown on the organisation's page. As "GIWS" does not seem to appear anywhere else in Wikipedia, the software article should be at the title "GIWS" and the dab page is not needed. Pam  D  23:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Message on it.wikt
Hallo PJTraill, thanks for your message on it.wiktionary. I've tried to give you an answer and I've integrated the other meaning of "or" in the entry. If you have other questions I would be very happy to satisfy your curiosity :) --Nastoshka (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, I have answered there PJTraill (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC).

November 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Nertz are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Greg Kouri
✅, thanks. GiantSnowman 19:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bivalve shell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exchange ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bivalve_shell check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bivalve_shell?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Done PJTraill (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health


The article Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 17:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:BEACH Comments by Professor Britt.png
Thanks for uploading File:BEACH Comments by Professor Britt.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Hamas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Margalit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)