User talk:PL Alvarez/Archive 2010

2010 Australian Open – Women's Singles
Don't need to jump the gun! Feudonym (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

About Severine Bremond Beltrame
You changed her name to Severine Bremond, but you didn't give any acceptable reason. So, I changed her name to Severine Bremond Beltrame. It is because she was divorced with her husband and coach Eric Bremond already.--Pierce (talk) 16:59, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Tennis tournaments - "Champions" section
Please use the the abbreviation "vs." instead of "def." as long as the final hasn't ended. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  19:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Error in tennis scores
In 7–6 scores, the 6 is marked in black, when must be the 7. And in some final scores, the loser of match is market in black. do you fix it? --Raymond Cruise (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Breaking the rules by default
It's not the first time you've done something like. I'm trying not to curse, instead I will give you the reasons why I think a limited suspension from wp would be a wake-up call for you: -- M96hardh (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Not by one word you explained why my lead section of the article was wrong and should be deleted.
 * 2) You seem to believe wikipedia articles should not have lead sections at all, since this is not the first time you've deleted them.
 * 3) You never ever provide any edit summary text.
 * 4) You never seem to respond to anyone on your discussion side.
 * 5) You've deleted messages on your discussion page without explanation.

Articles
Please remember to reference your articles. Ironholds (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If they are sources, mark them as such. The point of sourcing is verifiability; if you've got them stuck under "external links" (read: off-wiki stuff you might find interesting) it isn't useful. Ironholds (talk) 10:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry? Ironholds (talk) 10:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * And you're still doing it. Look, it's not difficult - mark as references, not external sources. Ironholds (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I've told you. "References" are "this is where the information comes from". "External Links" are "stuff we didn't get information from you might find useful". A key policy of Wikipedia is that information should be verifiable - when someone sees a fact in an article, the article should show where it came from. Marking references as "external links" insinuates they're not used as sources for the article and prevents the article being easily verifiable. Ironholds (talk) 13:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Warning
Hi PL Alvarez,

If you delete anything I create again I will be in contact with several administrators. I can't believe you. This is your last warning. T amer_of_Hope  talk  13:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

User behaviour warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

The reasons were given by me in this discussion page on 20 March 2010, an edit you were quick to censurize, but you can't delete history, so I guess everything you continue to delete will just make it worse, take this as a friendly advice. --M96hardh (talk) 02:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Discussion invitation
Hi PL Alvarez, I would like to invite you to a discussion on setting up good guidelines for tennis player notability. Please feel free to give comments and suggestions there. Thank you. Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 09:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

2009 Trophée des Alpilles – Singles
Hi. Great article, but  would you  mind telling  us what  the sport is?--Kudpung (talk) 11:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Dude
Hey, just leave the Nowrap| templae please, so it stays in the line!! Kante4 (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Of course only when it´s needed but for ramirez-hidalgo it´s needded nearly always.

I will see when i have time to help. ;-= Kante4 (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Please don't
Do what you did in these two edits. Not cool because nothing has been announced although I agree BA is very likely location but the surface is very unlikely to be hard. Please don't add things to wikipedia which are not referenced and that haven't been announced as wikipedia is not a crystal ball. KnowIG (talk) 11:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

2010 austrian atp
pls don't modify the box above, until the preview is closed. thank you-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Loughborough Challenger
Hey, the Loughborough Challenger is the old Caversham International Tennis Tournament. It is just a new venue but goes under the old name i heard... Kante4 (talk) 02:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

English again
Now you may not be a native speaker but that's no excuse. If you are not sure let someone else write it. Because this is not proper English it's just vomit. KnowIG (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

2010 ATP Challenger Tour
In future change the information presented on the page. Afro ( Talk ) 15:35, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis
What's your opinion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis? Thanks. G a b i n h o >:) 19:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)