User talk:PN-G bandkid

It doesn't matter which account you use, repeated vandalism will get you blocked. Consider this a final warning. If you revert again, you will be blocked. Woogee (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok. If you don't mind my asking, how do I appeal the editing? I'm not concerned with the block because that will be over with in a week. I'm concerned with the editing. It's not about me, it's about the school.
 * The talk page of the article in question is where you discuss that kind of thing. Just go to the article, and click the Talk tab up top, towards the left. That'll take you to the article's Talk page. All articles have (or, well, CAN have) these, for discussing work on that particular article. It should be just what you need. It'll need to wait until your block expires, but that's where you'll wanna go. Another way to skip to a talk page is to just go to "Talk:Name of article" (without the quotes, of course). - Vianello (Talk) 03:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Your interest, you say, is the school--that's fine, and often that interest and Wikipedia's interest coincide to a certain degree. WP wants articles on notable schools, but sometimes those articles digress into subject matter that cannot be called encyclopedic, that is, of interest to those not affiliated with the school itself. The lyrics of an alma mater, for instance, can't be claimed to have a broader interest. Also, Wikipedia articles ought to be neutral, and the text you added a few times isn't always neutral ("All that and more describes the 82 year rivalry"). Finally, some of the football stuff seems to be copied from this source--it wasn't acknowledged as such, and again its tone was not encyclopedic. Now, that article might be used, possibly, to support an objective statement about a football rivalry, but it cannot be quoted verbatim without referencing it, and it cannot be presented as objective fact. By all means continue your contributions to this and other articles, but please be mindful of the rules. That means discuss (on talk pages) and explain (in edit summaries), listen to other editors, and work in accordance with guidelines such as Neutral point of view (and note the reference to reliable sources in the opening paragraph. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)