User talk:PPEMES/Archives/2016/November

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Coat of Arms of the Order of Friars Minor.png


A tag has been placed on File:Coat of Arms of the Order of Friars Minor.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Craig J. N. de Paulo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Policy
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Craig J. N. de Paulo. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jytdog (talk) 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Please note that sources for the adherence of Church of the Province of West Africa to the Anglican alignment are all over the article (example: http://www.oikoumene.org/en/member-churches/church-of-the-province-of-west-africa). I'm sorry for any imperfect edits on the said article - please do help - but please also be kind to refrain from these overreactions, will you? Chicbyaccident (talk)
 * I am not interested in adding puffery to that article. Jytdog (talk) 01:09, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Feel free to object on the talk page of the article about what information you find relevant to include and what not, but the edits clearly do not violate WP:Verifiability. I therefore urge you to delete these templates that you have harrassed my talk page with. Chicbyaccident (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jan Count Dobrzenský z Dobrzenicz


A tag has been placed on Jan Count Dobrzenský z Dobrzenicz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 18:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I notice you placed a merger tag on Continuing Anglican movement without starting a discussion. Please give your reasons why you think the articles should be merged. (They seem to me to be about totally different things.) StAnselm (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)