User talk:PPEMES/Archives/2017/December

Greetings
I dont think we have communicated directly before, but after years away from WP I just checked my messages and see that you referenced my CC v RCC essay from 2006. I was very surprised that anyone anymore would be aware of that essay. I was too intensly involved at one time and it was good for me to be away from WP. Was shocked to see years later that the article title was changed to CC. I'd like to think I contributed to that change in some way even if I wasnt active when it happened. So, Im curious how you knew of my essay. All the best. Vaquero100 (talk) 03:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Greetings! Good job with your essay, which I believe still provides the most elaborate presentation of the perspective that we may still ultimately refer to. The arguments have by large gained acceptence here. The ones listed inWikiProject_Catholicism/Article_alerts remains as ongoing discussions. After those, the ones remaining on User:Grabado/List has yet to be discussed. Furthermore, there might remain some inconsistency inside the text of Catholic Church-pertaining articles. Yet, with or arguably without these changes in question, the picture is clear: the terminological integrity of the Catholic Church has gained WP:Consensus since many years. Although the drafted Proposed naming conventions (Catholic Church) failed, this naming proposal may be proposed as a further specified Wikipedia talk:Proposed naming conventions (Catholic Church)-inspired essay or convention. Your thoughts would be appreciated on any of these linked pages.Chicbyaccident (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)