User talk:PPEMES/Archives/2018/February

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (families)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (families), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (families) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (families) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 00:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Out-of-process move
Chicbyaccident

I have procedurally closed Categories for discussion/Log/2018_February_20, since it was clearly nomination made by you in bad faith.

Please read WP:BOLD. It does not entitle you to move a category when a proposal to do so did not achieve consensus. It does not entitle you to move a category which is under discussion at CfD.

If you disagree with any XfD close, please follow the process set out at WP:DRV.

If you continue with this tendentious and disruptive editing, I will propose WP:SANCTIONS on you. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Reply at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_20. Chicbyaccident (talk) 08:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Please see this. Could you help me out here, please? I don't know what to do. is not being helpful at all. Thanks! Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The discussion at CfD was closed. I have reverted your attempt to continue it.
 * Which part of "closed" is unclear to you?
 * Which part of " follow the process set out at WP:DRV" is unclear to you? -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This looks to me like just a timing and communication problem. I think the assumption outright accusation of bad faith is unjustified.  On the other side of the coin, this clash of actions has basically train-wrecked things, so trying to re-open the closed, or do other stuff with this mess right now is probably a fruitless waste of time and is likely to irritate people or cause more chaos.  My advice for anything like this is to just let it lie for a month, or three, or 6, then re-open a well-arranged proposal for a solution, that takes into account the previous discussions. WP:There is no deadline.  But, please, let's not call each other names or question each other's motives.  Not helpful, especially about trivial stuff like category naming (which, frankly, very close to 0 people in the whole world care about other than a few of us WP insiders doing maintenance >;-).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Schism
Does Canonical situation of the Society of St. Pius X perhaps change your mind about some of your latest edits? Athmharbh (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, had no intention to make any changes to the contents. The intention was merely a taxonomic update to make its top category reflect its article. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, if there is no schism, as the Holy See says, why do you say that the SSPX belongs to the "schism" top category? Athmharbh (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It was previously categorised in Category:Schisms in Christianity. I just updated that to Catholic per WP:Precise, arguably more conforming to your message. Either way, please update the way you find suitable, I am out of that discussion. Thanks! Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It seems that both the previous categorization and your "more precise" categorization are both incorrect. May I revert your restoration of the "schism" categorization, which I removed?  Athmharbh (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Consider me out of the picture. Thanks! Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies for my mistake in thinking you had undone my edit. I find you didn't.  I just wanted to avoid seeming to start an edit war.  Athmharbh (talk) 11:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I understand. No offense taken. Happy editing! Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)