User talk:PPLSI

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!  Teapot  george Talk  22:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Better Speeches in Ten Simple Steps
A tag has been placed on Better Speeches in Ten Simple Steps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Teapot  george Talk  22:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

My article "Better Speeches in Ten Simple Steps" is book description of a book that has been in print for more than a decade (since 1995). PPLSI (talk) 22:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for copy editing my article. It looks great!! PPLSI (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ohio Access to Justice
A tag has been placed on Ohio Access to Justice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 02:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Pre-Paid Legal Services of Mississippi, Inc.
A tag has been placed on National Pre-Paid Legal Services of Mississippi, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 02:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc., of Florida
A tag has been placed on Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc., of Florida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 02:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Wperdue (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TRL (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pre-Paid Legal Services of Tennessee, Inc.
A tag has been placed on Pre-Paid Legal Services of Tennessee, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  7   talk   02:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  7   talk   02:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop creating an entry for every subsidiary of your company in all 50 states. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion and these subsidiaries, by themselves, are not notable. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)wperdue

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. TRL (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Legal Service Plans of Virginia, Inc.
A tag has been placed on Legal Service Plans of Virginia, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  7   talk   02:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

blocked
This account has been banned as a spam-only account. Academic Challenger (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

on second thought
After looking further, it does seem that some of the content you have added is notable. I have blocked you for 3 hours now. If you return, please don't add an article for the Legal Services for every state. At the very most, this company needs only the article about itself, not the divisions for every state. Academic Challenger (talk) 03:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the second look. The company has received a lot of questions regarding the subsidiares. That is one reason why I was wanting to clarify these subsidiaries and which states legally needed to have these names. Would it be okay if I listed these subsidiaries in the main article? PPLSI (talk) 03:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently you are affiliated with this company.  Have you read WP:COI?  A more appropriate place to answer people's questions would be on your own company webpage, not on Wikipedia.     7   talk   03:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I just had an idea...would it be okay, if I created a "redirect article" for each of the subsidiaries that would automatically redirect to the main article? For example if someone researched "Ohio Access to Justice" they would be directed to the parent company article? Also, would it be okay to briefly list the subsidiaries in a short sub-section on the main article.

Also, I want thinking of updating the "L-3 Communications" article. Would I be allowed to list the 100+ divisions (briefly) within the main article?

Thank you.

PPLSI (talk) 03:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

That might be ok, but the main article is being listed for possible deletion right now. Better to negotiate a good version of that article, see if it survives the Articles for deletion vote, and then try to make the redirects. Listing the state subsidiaries in the article would definitely be fine if the article remains. Academic Challenger (talk) 03:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

But like the other user said, read the guidelines on Conflict of Interest. It would be much better to encourage other people to improve the articles from here and show why they are notable. Academic Challenger (talk) 03:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I just read the WP:COI article. I understand that Wikipedia is concerned about a conflict of interest; however, I believe that I can maintain the article appropriately and unbiased. I think this is shown by my edited article still having the "Criticism" section of the article intact. I have not tried to delete this section, nor would I attempt to delete any related "criticism". All business will be criticised by someone and I believe that the company speaks for itself.

There are several "out-of-date" facts in the article that need to be updated by someone who knows the current information and is willing to keep the article up-to-date. Does this make since? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. PPLSI (talk) 03:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

How do I give my reasons why the main article should not be deleted? The main article already existed, I just updated it with current information, added external links, and make several internal links additions. No COI issue should even be suggested, because the main article originally had "Criticism" section that still remains. PPLSI (talk) 03:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

''An example of an out-of-date fact that the main article contained. The original article stated that the company did business in only 4 providences of Canada. This was true until October of 2008. The company now operates in 5 providences.'' PPLSI (talk) 03:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * It's "provinces". TheFeds 04:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Would it be appropriate to put a list of organizations and individuals who endorse the company? For example, the National Association of Attorney Generals (NAAG) and the United States Chamber of Commerce endorsed the company. Would this information be allowed to be included as unbiased facts? PPLSI (talk) 04:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

By the way the Wiki article for the National Association of Attorney Generals (NAAG) states that the following: "Its rotating presidency is currently held by Lawrence Wasden of Idaho." However, if you visit the official website, you will see on the homepage that the Nebraska Attorney General (Jon Bruning) is the current President). May I update this fact within this article? PPLSI (talk) 04:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Without giving a specific endorsement of any of the above proposals, you need to be aware of a few things. Firstly, "paid editing"—e.g. doing PR work on for a corporation—is controversial (see the proposed policy WP:Paid editing), conflict of interest (see WP:COI) is heavily discouraged, and blatant advertisment is prohibited (see WP:Spam). In any event, articles must be written from a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV). Given what you've proposed, and because of your association with PPLSI, I suggest that you err on the side of caution and do not insert any material into the article that is not backed up by an impartial, easily-accessible (preferably online) source (see WP:RS for policies on citing reliable sources).

So, for example, if you wanted to include information about how some organization endorsed the company, you'd need to find a reliable source to document that fact, and cite it in the article. Additionally, you wouldn't want to site irrelevant examples—so the endorsement ought to be notable in some way. TheFeds 04:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocking again
You've just added a link to the "Press Release" page of the company's website! I'm blocking this account again for spamming, and have my doubts whether it should ever be unblocked, as you seem to have no comprehension of the concept of conflict of interest. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Your call
Blocking me because of a "paid to edit" status would make since IF I was getting paid to edit the entry. I am NOT getting paid by anyone to edit this article or anything else. Please be careful of accusations such as wrong intent, because they can lead to Wiki being sued.

If Wiki wants an article that is out-of-date and incorrect, it is not no skin off of my nose. If and when you want me to keep this article up-to-date, you can let me know. Thanks. PPLSI (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:LEGAL. Here is an excerpt: "If you make legal threats or take legal action over a Wikipedia dispute, you may be blocked from editing so that the matter is not exacerbated through other channels. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely while legal threats are outstanding." Wperdue (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)wperdue

Then you have made your decision to keep an article out-of-date. I can't understand why you want your company to be out of date. Poor decision. That is the beauty of America. You can still make poor business decisions. The next person who comes along and knows facts that are out of date in your articles and tries to help keep them up-to-date, you should be thankful and let them help you. PPLSI (talk) 00:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Adios Wikipedia.