User talk:PPNjegos

Montenegro
This is leading nowhere. We all need to sit at the table and talk. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Montenegro
Please stop reverting the language on the Montenegro page. The version that it is currently at was created with a drawn out discussion and consensus on the talk page. Please note that consensus does not have to have the full agreement of all parties, simply a majority. You are the only person objecting to the consensus. If you revert without further discussion on the talk page, I will block you for disruption. Woody (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit to Kosovo
You reinstated a poorly worded dependent clause into a sentence, a clause I'd removed as poorly worded and phrased, and brought to the talk page. Please self-revert and use the talk page, rather than revert out of hand. ThuranX (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not talking about the politics of it, I'm talking about the grammar. that's BAD WRITING. BAD BAD BAD WRITING. That's all I'm trying to correct. State that it broke awaty from Serbia in some OTHER fashion, than injecting it into the middle of the adjectives. Put it at the end "...Which broke away from Serbia in 2008" would be fine. Do NOT put it right back where it is a grammatical turd on a lawn. Really, that's ALL i'm tryign to do. fix the bad grammar. ThuranX (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, that's much better. I removed 'nominally' and replaced it with 'formerly', as 'nominally' is POV suggesting that it is still a part of Serbia. Since that's the heart of the conflict, and it's definitely a former part, and 'future' part remains to be seen, i edited that. ThuranX (talk) 22:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm well aware of your Anti-Kosovo POV. My point is that we treat material neutrally here. Since Kosovo sees itself as independent and has been recognized as such, we present that. We do not present Serbia's opinion on Kosovo as the only set of facts, just like we wouldn't present Hitler's view of the Jews as the only set of facts. ThuranX (talk) 23:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Kosovo will Never be Part of Serbia
'''PPNjegos, keep dreaming. Kosovo is gone from Serbia. Kosovo will never be part of Serbia. Maybe in your imagination, but - of course - the reality is different. You can continue dreaming or you can accept reality that Kosovo will never, ever, be part of Serbia.''' Bosniak (talk) 04:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Wtf? PPNjegos (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Well, we'll see how this'll play out. Also, do you really think that's necessary at the country InfoBox? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You didn't answer me.
 * The important thing is that Montenegro doesn't get too destabilized. The peaceful protests in MNE are good & can't be compared to the horrors that were seen in Belgrade. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Well, I just thought it's OK. :)
 * Yes indeed. Howre you doing by the way? PPNjegos (talk) 12:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Not nice as you can see, I'm having troubles with good ol' flags. :)
 * Easy. Let him scan and upload his sources, and then we'll see if he's right or wrong (probably the latter, since that sole Italian - not even domestic - book makes a confusion over the color copying from a white-black background). As for the latter, where he's completely inventing - I don't know how to convince him otherwise, but I guess more voices are what he needs. Sighs. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I think he is a big Croatian ultra-nationalist. DIREKTOR also noted that he might even favor the Ustashas. PPNjegos (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Huh?
Nope. BTW, where'd you get that idea? --Prevalis (talk) 22:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)