User talk:PRO RVNL

Wikipedia respects copyrights
Your edit to Rail Vikas Nigam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. The paragraphs you copied from https://www.rvnl.org/en/pages/aboutrvnl.aspx have been removed and will soon be revision-deleted, making them inaccessible to most users. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  22:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your username may need to be changed
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "PRO RVNL", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Your username suggests you represent Rail Vikas Nigam Limited. It also suggests that it may be used by more than one person, or that it might be a "role" account that will be used by someone else in the future. It is also a promotional username. None of these things is allowed. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  16:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest issue, please reply before continuing to edit
Hello PRO RVNL. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Rail Vikas Nigam, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PRO RVNL. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

Whether or not you are a paid editor, please reply acknowledging that you have read the mandatory paid editing requirements and conflict of interest links above and will abide by them to the extent that they apply to you. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  16:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)