User talk:PRUNIT

Welcome new user
Hello, PRUNIT, I see you've made a few edits to the encyclopaedia. You are most welcome. Here's a standard welcome box with lots of useful links. I hope you get pleasure from editing and making Wikipedia an even better resource for the community. If you have any questions about the project don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page here User_talk:Lumos3.

Happy editing,

Lumos3 (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC), Wikipedia Welcoming Committee.


 * }

February 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to European Union Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  07:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on European Union Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Wuh  Wuz  Dat  07:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at European Neighbourhood Policy, you may be blocked from editing. Wuh Wuz  Dat  07:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at European Union, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. your constant promotion of EUBAM is in violation of WP:SPAM Wuh  Wuz  Dat  08:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at European Union, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. your constant promotion of EUBAM is in violation of WP:SPAM Wuh  Wuz  Dat  14:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 15:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Not all of the edits were inappropriate perhaps you should read all the contribs before you block someone. Petrb (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)