User talk:PSOILFHJFHFDF

Welcome!

 * }

March 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety talk 17:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * It should also be noted I blocked your other account, . Tiptoety  talk 17:48, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

HUH?!!! Are you OK?!!--PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking the log, it says "Disruptive editing: Along with logging out to engage in an edit war." Based on your abuse of multiple accounts (see this admission, for starters), there are grounds for the block on the basis of prevention of future abuse.

If you agree that you have abused multiple accounts in the past, and if you agree not to do so in the future, then I'm willing to move onto the underlying concern of disruptive editing. —C.Fred (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I had no other options. Because the blocking admin sounded hostile to me and I thought he wanted to protect the spam article by blocking me. I haven't made any socks before he blocked me. Of course if you unblock me, I won't create any socks, because I won't need any! Why should I create socks if I can edit with my account?--PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * It looks like the edit in question was made without logging in rather than after creating another account. Looking deeper at that article's history, though, raises the question of whether this account exists only to carry over harassment from another language's Wikipedia. I need to consult with the blocking admin before I can do anything further. —C.Fred (talk) 19:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * That's my IP. I forgot to login. So what? Did I make any wrong edits? Was that edit disruptive? I don't think you need to do any in-depth analysis of people's psychological behavior to discover why do people nominate articles for deletion! Just tell me if I ever made any disruptive (i.e. vandalism etc...) edits or not?--PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/PSOILFHJFHFDF for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)