User talk:P D Agrawal

April 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Moissanite. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Mr Ollie,

I saw all my revisions being omitted so wanted to put forwards my thoughts and reasons for adding them for a better learning. Kindly let me know if they break any guidelines and reasons for omissions.

1. Metaphysics - The external link I provided would have been extremely useful to the reader if he would like to indulge further in the subject

2. Charles & Colvard - Is Patent expiration information not important?

3. Eastern Freeway - It was the first notable accident.

4. Engagement Ring - As a symbol of tradition and value there is a major shift and evolution happening for Engagement Ring which I think is worth mentioning

5. Diamond - Biggest change in the history of Diamonds was mentioned.

Kindly revert with your answers

- Hi Mr Ollie,

First of all, apologize for the contribution without an understanding of the guideline. Have been an audience in Wikipedia community since long but lately have just been excited to add my contributions from research on my favourite subjects. I Shall read the guidelines deeply to understand how editing works then discuss if I need further help.

Thank you.

--

New sections go at the bottom
I have deleted the addition you placed at the top of my talk page without looking at the content. Please sign your posts using four tildes. thanks. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 13:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that, very new to this P D Agrawal (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Graphology
I had added an existing fact about the limitation of this science that it can not know age or gender by handwriting of a person which was omitted by Roxy. Can I please understand the reason? P D Agrawal (talk) 14:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You used an unreliable source. See WP:RS -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 14:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Let me try finding more sources to substantiate my knowledge. I am a certified Graphologist myself so should be able to find hopefully. P D Agrawal (talk) 15:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I doubt it. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 15:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Diamond, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amkgp (talk) 07:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

I apologise for the same but can you please help me on how does one check the credibility of any website for Wikipedia standards before citing any particular one? Thank you

Your draft article, Draft:Fiona Diamonds


Hello, P D Agrawal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fiona Diamonds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)