User talk:P orbital

WP does not really seek primary references ...
Hi, perhaps as someone a little new here, you might not know the Wikipedia guideline WP:SECONDARY that indicates a preference for secondary sources (reviews and books) not primary references (journals). Some journal references are often inevitable, but many tens of thousands of journal articles appear each year. So to follow an encyclopedia's style, the best Wikipedia articles tend to have "digested" references that give readers more perspective, less newsy insights (WP:NOTNEWS). So if you get the time, you might want to go through pentacene and replace some journal references with citations to books or a reviews. This step would be a real benefit to Wikipedia since you obviously have good knowledge of this area. In general, replacing journal cites with reviews and books is a sign of good encyclopedic scholarship. Happy editing, --Smokefoot (talk) 13:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)