User talk:Pablo.morales.la.bomba

siempre serás bienvenido

Hi, I am a Mexican Wikipedian. I contribute to both English and Spanish-language editions of Wikipedia. I received both a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of New York University. I am currently a part time MBA student at New York University Stern School of Business. Feel free to leave a message for me. Regards, Pablo Morales--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Polytechnic images
You placed a message on my talk page, requesting images of the old Poly logo. I have a few images, and have uploaded two of them. Tripodics (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Poly-blue logo.jpeg File:Polytechnic-gold-logo.jpg


 * Perhaps you missed the bit in the SPI where DGG said "We should confine the blocks to those for whom there is stronger evidence, such as adding inappropriate material. Among those I would certainly include Pablo.morales.la.bomba, who has been adding highly promotional excessively detailed material to the List of NYU Polytechnic Institute people." Unless you provide evidence to refute that shown in the SPI and commit to avoiding the problematic behavior DGG noted, I think your chances of being unblocked are slim. Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 20:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I refrained from problematic behavior. And my tireless contributions say a lot about me.--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 20:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I am not a spammer. I was jus trying to improve the article. I was working collaboratively with other users. I got blocked because there was a pending SPI, not because of my behaviour. If something was wrong with my behavior then many other editors should get blocked along with me.--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed sockpuppets of this user have been warned (1, 2) not to abuse the unblock request process... apparently to no avail. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  04:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment I would support unblocking only if you intended to work on other subjects, and refrained from editing NYU-Poly and subjects and people connected with it. It does not help  the encyclopedia to copy over their press releases.   DGG ( talk ) 06:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You may want to clarify that such a ban on articles includes NYU-Poly, NYU and related institutions, subjects (such as the lists that were split off) and people (faculty and alumni) connected with those institutions, talk pages, AfDs, etc. 72Dino (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hmmm. The whole discussion above - especially FisherQueen's decline - and the presence of sockpuppets indicate to me that this is more than an issue of COI spamming. I do not believe that this user truly understands Wikipedia's purpose or many of the policies he's violated; it appears as though they're just saying what they need to say in order to be unblocked. If that's the case, it seems likely we'll end up back here in a few months, if not weeks. I'd like to see the standard offer met before any unblocking is considered... possibly the "second chance" as well. Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 18:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The user has shown absolutely no remorse over anything he has done over the lengthily ordeal that he has put the community with his disruptive editing spanning fifteen sockpuppets and several IPs (1, 2). If anything, his editing has progressively become more hostile and antagonistic (going as far as to open a SPI against me and 72Dino in retaliation). -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  19:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Pablo, for your benefit, the "standard offer" is thus: You do not edit Wikipedia under any account or IP address for at least six months. After six months of no editing, if you can demonstrate that you have a better understanding of Wikipedia's policies and why your past conduct was problematic, and commit to avoiding said behavior in the future, you stand a much better chance of being unblocked. This is not an entitlement to an unblock after six months; you will still need to demonstrate that you will be a constructive and useful editor should you be unblocked. More information is available at WP:OFFER. Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 20:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Well, first, I want to clarify: I'm not a sockpuppet. I am aware of the sock-puppet case and the unconstructive edits that were made by 72Dino and Marco Guzman, Jr. The latter is a paid employee of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Unfortunately, the link has expired. It will become quite obvious upon seeing their "contribution history" that are meat puppets. Both accounts have repeatedly disrupted the NYU-Poly article in the past. In fact, I created this account to counter vandalism against the NYU-Poly article. Although I haven't broken any law, I still agree to your proposal. And I would request you to please watch the NYU-Poly and related articles in the meantime. I don't think that 72Dino and Marco Guzman, Jr would take a long to begin to change colors again. 72Dino is not a particular vandal, but is a meat puppet. Marco Guzman, Jr and his sock Dabackgammonator work to promote California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, even if that requires commiting vandalism. Multiple accounts are allowed in Wikipedia. Sockpuppetry case is for protecting Wikipedia from vandalism. Unfortunately, sockpuppetry case is being used for the opposite purpose here.--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 21:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Sigh... this is the link that Mangoeater1000 sockpuppet's repeatedly use to accuse me of being a paid employee of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona). This accusation is not true. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  13:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * What does that mean in plain English? The link doesn't work--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't get too excited, I'll be back very soon.--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The link to the Wayback Machine works fine, and it links to an article in the Cal Poly Pomona school newspaper that as a student Marco started the CPP WikiProject. And per the terms of the standard offer, "back very soon" will not be at least for six months. 72Dino (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * This new link also clearly states that "Guzman created the Cal Poly Wiki Project to help promote and distinguish Cal Poly Pomona from other Universities also featured on Wikipedia.org."--Pablo.morales.la.bomba (talk) 15:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * This thread has nothing to do with your own behavior on Wikipedia, which is the reason you have been repeatedly blocked and denied unblocks. 72Dino (talk) 16:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. It was also written over four years ago, it's not a direct quote, and doesn't state that I'm paid employee of the university. It's what the author of the article (Stacey Olivas) thought the CPP WikiProject was, wrongly, about. I stand by my direct quotes published on the article (those not taken out of context), but cannot do so for everything Ms. Olivas wrote and interpreted. To summarize on the phony accusations you have made:
 * 1. I'm not a sockpuppet of User:Dabackgammonator or vice versa. It was my old account that's been inactive since Jan. 2010 as pointed out by User:Anthony Bradbury.
 * 2. User:72Dino and I are not affiliated in any way or form.
 * 3. I'm not a paid employee of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona)
 * -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  16:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

The offer which you have accepted means no editing at all, including on this page, for six months, after which you can post an unblock request. If you are unable to comply with this I will deny you access to this page. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * In an edit summary one of his socks had already stated that he'd be "...out from Wiki for at least 1 year. I promise". I hope this time around he stays true to his word. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  17:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks like the standard offer has already been violated here. 72Dino (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Talk page access recovation for User:Pablo.morales.la.bomba. Thank you.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 00:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts (see Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000). Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at . - Mifter (talk) 00:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)