User talk:Pablohurt

Welcome!
Hello, Pablohurt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  DGG ( talk ) 17:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

==Problems with your articles.

I'm one of the more experienced editors of scientific biographies here, and I'd like to offer you some assistance.

1. All Biographies of Living people must be sourced in every detail. For the routine facts of a person's career, their academic CVs are enough; for their papers, Google Scholar of Wen of Science or Scopus. But for anything involving a judgement or evaluation, there needs to be a specific independent published source. We do not make exceptions to this.

2. WP does not use text copied from other sources. This is a copyright violation; your articles read as if they were infact copied from a university press release or similar source. If there is any such material it must be removed and rewritten from scratch.

3. WP is an encyclopedia, and is written in an objective and formal manner.We do not refer to people other than popular entertainers by their first name alone, we do not talk about minor details of their education, We can list the number of children, but we do not invade the children's privacy by giving  the manner in which they were conceived. We do not include minor projects and publications,but wmphasize the work they are notable for. We do not link to social media sites, and only a single link to the individual's principal website in an "External Links" section at the end. s

3. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a medium for press releases.We omit adjectives of praise, or statements of how excellent someone's work is. Their positions and the awards given to them should demonstrate this sufficiently.

4. WP has a manual of style, [[,linked to above in the Welcome message. We make links to and from other relevant articles--at a minimum, the general article for the subject the person works in, the articles for societies of which he is a member, the universities he attended, and the ones he worked at. We add references in the end, not links to the CV in the text. We link to the person from the section on notable people of his college and school. We write whenever possible in paragraphs, not lists.

The first two problems here are considered especially serious, and are grounds for immediate removal of the article. I'm one of the administrators here, and I could have done this. But since Joyce Harper and Richard Sharpe (scientist) are very important scientists, I instead am giving you the opportunity to fix the article. I will look back in a week or two; if not fixed, I will probably still avoid deletion by reducing the article to a bare minimum to show the notability, which can be properly added to later. If you needany further help, please ask on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 17:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Joyce Harper has been reverted. Your edit here to Joyce Harper was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjzW5grPLZA)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to.  Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Sharpe (scientist)


The article Richard Sharpe (scientist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)